these did not truncate excess precision in the return value. fixing
them looks like considerable work, and the current C code seems to
outperform them significantly anyway.
long double functions are left in place because they are not subject
to excess precision issues and probably better than the C code.
+++ /dev/null
-// see exp_ld.s
+++ /dev/null
-# see exp.s
+++ /dev/null
-# see exp.s
-# see exp.s
+# see exp_ld.s
-.global expm1f
-.type expm1f,@function
-expm1f:
- flds 4(%esp)
- mov 4(%esp),%eax
- add %eax,%eax
- cmp $0x01000000,%eax
- jae 1f
- # subnormal x, return x with underflow
- fld %st(0)
- fmul %st(1)
- fstps 4(%esp)
- ret
-
.global expm1l
.type expm1l,@function
expm1l:
fldt 4(%esp)
- jmp 1f
-
-.global expm1
-.type expm1,@function
-expm1:
- fldl 4(%esp)
- mov 8(%esp),%eax
- add %eax,%eax
- cmp $0x00200000,%eax
- jae 1f
- # subnormal x, return x with underflow
- fsts 4(%esp)
- ret
-1: fldl2e
+ fldl2e
fmulp
mov $0xc2820000,%eax
push %eax
fsubrp
ret
-.global exp2f
-.type exp2f,@function
-exp2f:
- flds 4(%esp)
- jmp 1f
-
.global exp2l
.global __exp2l
.hidden __exp2l
exp2l:
__exp2l:
fldt 4(%esp)
- jmp 1f
-
-.global expf
-.type expf,@function
-expf:
- flds 4(%esp)
- jmp 2f
-
-.global exp
-.type exp,@function
-exp:
- fldl 4(%esp)
-2: fldl2e
- fmulp
- jmp 1f
-
-.global exp2
-.type exp2,@function
-exp2:
- fldl 4(%esp)
1: sub $12,%esp
fld %st(0)
fstpt (%esp)
+++ /dev/null
-# see exp.s
+++ /dev/null
-# see exp.s
+++ /dev/null
-# see exp.s
-# see exp.s
+# see exp_ld.s