From efbd30b934fa773634dd2b2e18e2824795973bc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Grothoff <christian@grothoff.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:52:46 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] details on missing features

---
 src/fs/fs.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/fs/fs.c b/src/fs/fs.c
index 946a06bde..e14f0570a 100644
--- a/src/fs/fs.c
+++ b/src/fs/fs.c
@@ -359,6 +359,11 @@ deserialize_fi_node (struct GNUNET_FS_Handle *h,
       ret->data.file.do_index = GNUNET_NO;
       ret->data.file.have_hash = GNUNET_NO;
       ret->data.file.index_start_confirmed = GNUNET_NO;
+      /* FIXME: what's our approach for dealing with the
+	 'reader' and 'reader_cls' fields?  I guess the only
+	 good way would be to dump "small" files into 
+	 'rh' and to not support serialization of "large"
+	 files (!?) */
       break;
     case 1: /* file-index, no hash */
       if (GNUNET_OK !=
@@ -368,6 +373,9 @@ deserialize_fi_node (struct GNUNET_FS_Handle *h,
       ret->data.file.do_index = GNUNET_YES;
       ret->data.file.have_hash = GNUNET_NO;
       ret->data.file.index_start_confirmed = GNUNET_NO;
+      /* FIXME: what's our approach for dealing with the
+	 'reader' and 'reader_cls' fields? 
+	 (should be easy for indexing since we must have a file) */
       break;
     case 2: /* file-index-with-hash */
       if ( (GNUNET_OK !=
@@ -379,6 +387,9 @@ deserialize_fi_node (struct GNUNET_FS_Handle *h,
       ret->data.file.do_index = GNUNET_YES;
       ret->data.file.have_hash = GNUNET_YES;
       ret->data.file.index_start_confirmed = GNUNET_NO;
+      /* FIXME: what's our approach for dealing with the
+	 'reader' and 'reader_cls' fields? 
+	 (should be easy for indexing since we must have a file) */
       break;
     case 3: /* file-index-with-hash-confirmed */
       if ( (GNUNET_OK !=
@@ -390,6 +401,9 @@ deserialize_fi_node (struct GNUNET_FS_Handle *h,
       ret->data.file.do_index = GNUNET_YES;
       ret->data.file.have_hash = GNUNET_YES;
       ret->data.file.index_start_confirmed = GNUNET_YES;
+      /* FIXME: what's our approach for dealing with the
+	 'reader' and 'reader_cls' fields? 
+	 (should be easy for indexing since we must have a file) */
       break;
     case 4: /* directory */
       if ( (GNUNET_OK !=
-- 
2.25.1