From d9969ea175503bdd37fdc966a0ed38bb6f81ff89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 20:31:33 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] - correct comment. Should revisit gcc >= 4.1 with that =1
 later on

---
 Rules.mak | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Rules.mak b/Rules.mak
index 1cab1f2fc..51c9baeab 100644
--- a/Rules.mak
+++ b/Rules.mak
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ endif # arm
 $(if $(call is_eq,$(__TARGET_ARCH),i386),\
   $(call check_gcc,OPTIMIZATIONS,-march=i386,))
 
-# gcc-4.0 and older seem to suffer from these
+# gcc-4.0 and older seem to benefit from these
 $(if $(call cc_le,4,0),\
   $(call check_gcc,OPTIMIZATIONS,-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2,)\
   $(call check_gcc,OPTIMIZATIONS,-falign-functions=1 -falign-jumps=1 -falign-loops=1,\
-- 
2.25.1