From ab1dd087129a4303e6caa793ec54747ec7a95163 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Grothoff Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:12:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] bug links --- src/transport/gnunet-communicator-tcp.c | 2 +- src/transport/gnunet-communicator-udp.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/transport/gnunet-communicator-tcp.c b/src/transport/gnunet-communicator-tcp.c index 93f510be0..47bffa2ba 100644 --- a/src/transport/gnunet-communicator-tcp.c +++ b/src/transport/gnunet-communicator-tcp.c @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ * @author Christian Grothoff * * TODO: - * - add and use util/ check for IPv6 availability (#V6) + * - add and use util/ check for IPv6 availability (#5553) * - support DNS names in BINDTO option (#5528) * - support NAT connection reversal method (#5529) * - support other TCP-specific NAT traversal methods (#5531) diff --git a/src/transport/gnunet-communicator-udp.c b/src/transport/gnunet-communicator-udp.c index c88f7f6f5..550ba7c85 100644 --- a/src/transport/gnunet-communicator-udp.c +++ b/src/transport/gnunet-communicator-udp.c @@ -24,14 +24,14 @@ * @author Christian Grothoff * * TODO: - * - add and use util/ check for IPv6 availability (#V6) + * - add and use util/ check for IPv6 availability (#5553) * - consider imposing transmission limits in the absence * of ACKs; or: maybe this should be done at TNG service level? * (at least the receiver might want to enforce limits on - * KX/DH operations per sender in here) + * KX/DH operations per sender in here) (#5552) * - overall, we should look more into flow control support * (either in backchannel, or general solution in TNG service) - * - handle addresses discovered from broadcasts (#BC) + * - handle addresses discovered from broadcasts (#5551) * (think: what was the story again on address validation? * where is the API for that!?!) * - support DNS names in BINDTO option (#5528) @@ -1672,7 +1672,7 @@ sock_read (void *cls) "# broadcasts received", 1, GNUNET_NO); - // FIXME #BC: we effectively just got a HELLO! + // FIXME #5551: we effectively just got a HELLO! // trigger verification NOW! return; } -- 2.25.1