From a5874aef6eac51ccc41e49a427a4d98a6d6ec57a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:29:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Updated usb regs (markdown)

---
 usb-regs.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/usb-regs.md b/usb-regs.md
index ff8f7a0..84a6299 100644
--- a/usb-regs.md
+++ b/usb-regs.md
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ For example EP0 = +0x00; EP1 = +0x02; or offset+(EPn << 1). In these address spa
     BIT4 - 1 - reset fifo; 0 - disable reset?
     comments: probably compatible with ZM_EP3_BYTE_COUNT_HIGH_OFFSET.  
 **These name reg do not fit to pattern!!!** Compare with 0x3e, 0x3f and 0x5e, 0x5f.
+If we have 0x3e, 0x3f and 0x5e, 0x5f, why do we need this register?
 
 # 0xBE ZM_EP3_BYTE_COUNT_LOW_OFFSET
     size of data in fifo buffer? never used?
-- 
2.25.1