From 8e662f28fe7d5ef31f749d7c6cb5aee5b33a6f28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gabor Juhos Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:57:39 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] generic: 3.2: don't disable lockdep for OOT modules SVN-Revision: 29846 --- ...ude-TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND-from-d.patch | 47 ++++++++++++++++++ ...ude-TAINT_OOT_MODULE-from-disabling-.patch | 48 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+) create mode 100644 target/linux/generic/patches-3.2/030-lockdep-bug-Exclude-TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND-from-d.patch create mode 100644 target/linux/generic/patches-3.2/031-lockdep-bug-Exclude-TAINT_OOT_MODULE-from-disabling-.patch diff --git a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.2/030-lockdep-bug-Exclude-TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND-from-d.patch b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.2/030-lockdep-bug-Exclude-TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND-from-d.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..212a7a5171 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.2/030-lockdep-bug-Exclude-TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND-from-d.patch @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +From df754e6af2f237a6c020c0daff55a1a609338e31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Peter Zijlstra +Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:13:49 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep, bug: Exclude TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND from disabling lockdep + +It's unlikely that TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND causes false +lockdep messages, so do not disable lockdep in that case. +We still want to keep lockdep disabled in the +TAINT_OOT_MODULE case: + + - bin-only modules can cause various instabilities in + their and in unrelated kernel code + + - they are impossible to debug for kernel developers + + - they also typically do not have the copyright license + permission to link to the GPL-ed lockdep code. + +Suggested-by: Ben Hutchings +Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra +Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-xopopjjens57r0i13qnyh2yo@git.kernel.org +Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar +--- + kernel/panic.c | 12 ++++++++++-- + 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +--- a/kernel/panic.c ++++ b/kernel/panic.c +@@ -240,8 +240,16 @@ void add_taint(unsigned flag) + * Also we want to keep up lockdep for staging development and + * post-warning case. + */ +- if (flag != TAINT_CRAP && flag != TAINT_WARN && __debug_locks_off()) +- printk(KERN_WARNING "Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint\n"); ++ switch (flag) { ++ case TAINT_CRAP: ++ case TAINT_WARN: ++ case TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND: ++ break; ++ ++ default: ++ if (__debug_locks_off()) ++ printk(KERN_WARNING "Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint\n"); ++ } + + set_bit(flag, &tainted_mask); + } diff --git a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.2/031-lockdep-bug-Exclude-TAINT_OOT_MODULE-from-disabling-.patch b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.2/031-lockdep-bug-Exclude-TAINT_OOT_MODULE-from-disabling-.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..398bb3ed23 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.2/031-lockdep-bug-Exclude-TAINT_OOT_MODULE-from-disabling-.patch @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +From 9ec84acee1e221d99dc33237bff5e82839d10cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Ben Hutchings +Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 14:30:58 +0000 +Subject: [PATCH 2/2] lockdep, bug: Exclude TAINT_OOT_MODULE from disabling lock debugging + +We do want to allow lock debugging for GPL-compatible modules +that are not (yet) built in-tree. This was disabled as a +side-effect of commit 2449b8ba0745327c5fa49a8d9acffe03b2eded69 +('module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built +in-tree'). Lock debug warnings now include taint flags, so +kernel developers should still be able to deflect warnings +caused by out-of-tree modules. + +The TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE flag for non-GPL-compatible modules +will still disable lock debugging. + +Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings +Cc: Nick Bowler +Cc: Greg KH +Cc: Dave Jones +Cc: Rusty Russell +Cc: Randy Dunlap +Cc: Debian kernel maintainers +Cc: Peter Zijlstra +Cc: Alan Cox +Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1323268258.18450.11.camel@deadeye +Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar +--- + kernel/panic.c | 5 +++-- + 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +--- a/kernel/panic.c ++++ b/kernel/panic.c +@@ -237,11 +237,12 @@ void add_taint(unsigned flag) + * Can't trust the integrity of the kernel anymore. + * We don't call directly debug_locks_off() because the issue + * is not necessarily serious enough to set oops_in_progress to 1 +- * Also we want to keep up lockdep for staging development and +- * post-warning case. ++ * Also we want to keep up lockdep for staging/out-of-tree ++ * development and post-warning case. + */ + switch (flag) { + case TAINT_CRAP: ++ case TAINT_OOT_MODULE: + case TAINT_WARN: + case TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND: + break; -- 2.25.1