From 7ad1369857935e6e823690cd3779f49d98a3c460 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guus Sliepen Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:01:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Don't take the address of a variable whose scope is about to disappear. Conflicts: src/net_packet.c --- src/net_packet.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/net_packet.c b/src/net_packet.c index cd8d98a..7a473ab 100644 --- a/src/net_packet.c +++ b/src/net_packet.c @@ -500,16 +500,16 @@ static void send_udppacket(node_t *n, vpn_packet_t *origpkt) { struct sockaddr *sa; socklen_t sl; int sock; + sockaddr_t broadcast; /* Overloaded use of priority field: -1 means local broadcast */ if(origpriority == -1 && n->prevedge) { - struct sockaddr_in in; - in.sin_family = AF_INET; - in.sin_addr.s_addr = -1; - in.sin_port = n->prevedge->address.in.sin_port; - sa = (struct sockaddr *)∈ - sl = sizeof in; + broadcast.in.sin_family = AF_INET; + broadcast.in.sin_addr.s_addr = -1; + broadcast.in.sin_port = n->prevedge->address.in.sin_port; + sa = &broadcast.sa; + sl = sizeof broadcast.in; sock = 0; } else { if(origpriority == -1) -- 2.25.1