From 1c3e0a197658ebb60783ed4db8d14234c0a5657b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Bodo=20M=C3=B6ller?= Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 15:10:11 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Changed a comment. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR: --- ssl/ssl_cert.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ssl/ssl_cert.c b/ssl/ssl_cert.c index 0d1c570113..9bfa3ecf2e 100644 --- a/ssl/ssl_cert.c +++ b/ssl/ssl_cert.c @@ -328,8 +328,12 @@ int ssl_cert_inst(CERT **o) * (which cannot really happen, as it is initially created in * SSL_CTX_new; but the earlier code usually allows for that one * being non-existant, so we follow that behaviour, as it might - * turn out that there actually is a reason for it.). */ - + * turn out that there actually is a reason for it -- but I'm + * not sure that *all* of the existing code could cope with + * s->cert being NULL, otherwise we could do without the + * initialization in SSL_CTX_new). + */ + if (o == NULL) { SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL_CERT_INST, ERR_R_PASSED_NULL_PARAMETER); -- 2.25.1