From 126aa6ec0b66d729cbaa64059d7565bb8e00fc97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 14:13:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] reduce timeout for pppoe
SVN-Revision: 1853
---
.../patches/208-no_exponential_timeout.patch | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 openwrt/package/ppp/patches/208-no_exponential_timeout.patch
diff --git a/openwrt/package/ppp/patches/208-no_exponential_timeout.patch b/openwrt/package/ppp/patches/208-no_exponential_timeout.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d6c986a7ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/openwrt/package/ppp/patches/208-no_exponential_timeout.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+diff -urN ppp.old/pppd/plugins/rp-pppoe/discovery.c ppp.dev/pppd/plugins/rp-pppoe/discovery.c
+--- ppp.old/pppd/plugins/rp-pppoe/discovery.c 2005-09-05 15:25:35.917232000 +0200
++++ ppp.dev/pppd/plugins/rp-pppoe/discovery.c 2005-09-05 15:29:17.233586872 +0200
+@@ -593,12 +593,14 @@
+ conn->discoveryState = STATE_SENT_PADI;
+ waitForPADO(conn, timeout);
+
++#if 0
+ /* If we're just probing for access concentrators, don't do
+ exponential backoff. This reduces the time for an unsuccessful
+ probe to 15 seconds. */
+ if (!conn->printACNames) {
+ timeout *= 2;
+ }
++#endif
+ if (conn->printACNames && conn->numPADOs) {
+ break;
+ }
+@@ -621,7 +623,9 @@
+ sendPADR(conn);
+ conn->discoveryState = STATE_SENT_PADR;
+ waitForPADS(conn, timeout);
++#if 0
+ timeout *= 2;
++#endif
+ } while (conn->discoveryState == STATE_SENT_PADR);
+
+ /* We're done. */
--
2.25.1