From 0b3a38b9f573634faa4f2bc8b0ffb6f55c0958f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denys Vlasenko Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 16:11:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ntpd: speed up resyncing if our clock is seriously off function old new delta recv_and_process_peer_pkt 892 922 +30 Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko --- networking/ntpd.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/networking/ntpd.c b/networking/ntpd.c index fd2f24a89..ed83415b4 100644 --- a/networking/ntpd.c +++ b/networking/ntpd.c @@ -90,12 +90,24 @@ * was hibernated, someone set totally wrong date, etc), * then the time is stepped, all datapoints are discarded, * and we go back to steady state. + * + * Made some changes to speed up re-syncing after our clock goes bad + * (tested with suspending my laptop): + * - if largish offset (>= STEP_THRESHOLD * 8 == 1 sec) is seen + * from a peer, schedule next query for this peer soon + * without drastically lowering poll interval for everybody. + * This makes us collect enough data for step much faster: + * e.g. at poll = 10 (1024 secs), step was done within 5 minutes + * after first reply which indicated that our clock is 14 seconds off. + * - on step, do not discard d_dispersion data of the existing datapoints, + * do not clear reachable_bits. This prevents discarding first ~8 + * datapoints after the step. */ -#define RETRY_INTERVAL 5 /* on error, retry in N secs */ +#define RETRY_INTERVAL 5 /* on error, retry in N secs */ #define RESPONSE_INTERVAL 15 /* wait for reply up to N secs */ -#define INITIAL_SAMPLES 4 /* how many samples do we want for init */ -#define BAD_DELAY_GROWTH 4 /* drop packet if its delay grew by more than this */ +#define INITIAL_SAMPLES 4 /* how many samples do we want for init */ +#define BAD_DELAY_GROWTH 4 /* drop packet if its delay grew by more than this */ /* Clock discipline parameters and constants */ @@ -109,6 +121,10 @@ #define FREQ_TOLERANCE 0.000015 /* frequency tolerance (15 PPM) */ #define BURSTPOLL 0 /* initial poll */ #define MINPOLL 5 /* minimum poll interval. std ntpd uses 6 (6: 64 sec) */ +/* If we got largish offset from a peer, cap next query interval + * for this peer by this many seconds: + */ +#define BIGOFF_INTERVAL (1 << 6) /* If offset > discipline_jitter * POLLADJ_GATE, and poll interval is >= 2^BIGPOLL, * then it is decreased _at once_. (If < 2^BIGPOLL, it will be decreased _eventually_). */ @@ -1658,11 +1674,13 @@ recv_and_process_peer_pkt(peer_t *p) ssize_t size; msg_t msg; double T1, T2, T3, T4; - double dv; + double dv, offset; unsigned interval; datapoint_t *datapoint; peer_t *q; + offset = 0; + /* We can recvfrom here and check from.IP, but some multihomed * ntp servers reply from their *other IP*. * TODO: maybe we should check at least what we can: from.port == 123? @@ -1766,13 +1784,13 @@ recv_and_process_peer_pkt(peer_t *p) p->datapoint_idx = p->reachable_bits ? (p->datapoint_idx + 1) % NUM_DATAPOINTS : 0; datapoint = &p->filter_datapoint[p->datapoint_idx]; datapoint->d_recv_time = T4; - datapoint->d_offset = ((T2 - T1) + (T3 - T4)) / 2; + datapoint->d_offset = offset = ((T2 - T1) + (T3 - T4)) / 2; datapoint->d_dispersion = LOG2D(msg.m_precision_exp) + G_precision_sec; if (!p->reachable_bits) { /* 1st datapoint ever - replicate offset in every element */ int i; for (i = 0; i < NUM_DATAPOINTS; i++) { - p->filter_datapoint[i].d_offset = datapoint->d_offset; + p->filter_datapoint[i].d_offset = offset; } } @@ -1780,7 +1798,7 @@ recv_and_process_peer_pkt(peer_t *p) if ((MAX_VERBOSE && G.verbose) || (option_mask32 & OPT_w)) { bb_error_msg("reply from %s: offset:%+f delay:%f status:0x%02x strat:%d refid:0x%08x rootdelay:%f reach:0x%02x", p->p_dotted, - datapoint->d_offset, + offset, p->lastpkt_delay, p->lastpkt_status, p->lastpkt_stratum, @@ -1865,6 +1883,20 @@ recv_and_process_peer_pkt(peer_t *p) /* Decide when to send new query for this peer */ pick_normal_interval: interval = poll_interval(0); + if (fabs(offset) >= STEP_THRESHOLD * 8 && interval > BIGOFF_INTERVAL) { + /* If we are synced, offsets are less than STEP_THRESHOLD, + * or at the very least not much larger than it. + * Now we see a largish one. + * Either this peer is feeling bad, or packet got corrupted, + * or _our_ clock is wrong now and _all_ peers will show similar + * largish offsets too. + * I observed this with laptop suspend stopping clock. + * In any case, it makes sense to make next request soonish: + * cases 1 and 2: get a better datapoint, + * case 3: allows to resync faster. + */ + interval = BIGOFF_INTERVAL; + } set_next_and_ret: set_next(p, interval); -- 2.25.1