From 0974d59b5f1808a0748b5611d8943c72027f72ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Merhar Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:12:03 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] kernel: backport fix for non-regular inodes on f2fs Upstream commit dda9f4b9ca ("f2fs: fix to skip verifying block address for non-regular inode"). On 4.14, attempting to perform operations on a non-regular inode residing on an f2fs filesystem, such rm-ing a device node, would fail and lead to a warning / call trace in dmesg. This fix was already applied to other kernels upstream - including 4.19, from which the patch was taken. More info at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202495. Signed-off-by: Matt Merhar (cherry picked from commit ee500186a5617dfe80f4b762fd6bd0c38af93d49) --- ...ying-block-address-non-regular-inode.patch | 69 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+) create mode 100644 target/linux/generic/backport-4.14/050-v4.19-f2fs-skip-verifying-block-address-non-regular-inode.patch diff --git a/target/linux/generic/backport-4.14/050-v4.19-f2fs-skip-verifying-block-address-non-regular-inode.patch b/target/linux/generic/backport-4.14/050-v4.19-f2fs-skip-verifying-block-address-non-regular-inode.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..65ab16a97a --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/generic/backport-4.14/050-v4.19-f2fs-skip-verifying-block-address-non-regular-inode.patch @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +From dda9f4b9cac6bdd2a96253b4444d7a6ce5132edb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Chao Yu +Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 23:42:09 +0800 +Subject: f2fs: fix to skip verifying block address for non-regular inode + +generic/184 1s ... [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch + --- tests/generic/184.out 2015-01-11 16:52:27.643681072 +0800 + QA output created by 184 - silence is golden + +rm: cannot remove '/mnt/f2fs/null': Bad address + +mknod: '/mnt/f2fs/null': Bad address + +chmod: cannot access '/mnt/f2fs/null': Bad address + +./tests/generic/184: line 36: /mnt/f2fs/null: Bad address + ... + +F2FS-fs (zram0): access invalid blkaddr:259 +EIP: f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x14b/0x1b0 [f2fs] + f2fs_iget+0x927/0x1010 [f2fs] + f2fs_lookup+0x26e/0x630 [f2fs] + __lookup_slow+0xb3/0x140 + lookup_slow+0x31/0x50 + walk_component+0x185/0x1f0 + path_lookupat+0x51/0x190 + filename_lookup+0x7f/0x140 + user_path_at_empty+0x36/0x40 + vfs_statx+0x61/0xc0 + __do_sys_stat64+0x29/0x40 + sys_stat64+0x13/0x20 + do_fast_syscall_32+0xaa/0x22c + entry_SYSENTER_32+0x53/0x86 + +In f2fs_iget(), we will check inode's first block address, if it is valid, +we will set FI_FIRST_BLOCK_WRITTEN flag in inode. + +But we should only do this for regular inode, otherwise, like special +inode, i_addr[0] is used for storing device info instead of block address, +it will fail checking flow obviously. + +So for non-regular inode, let's skip verifying address and setting flag. + +Signed-off-by: Chao Yu +Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim +--- + fs/f2fs/inode.c | 14 ++++++++------ + 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) + +--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c ++++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c +@@ -310,13 +310,15 @@ static int do_read_inode(struct inode *i + /* get rdev by using inline_info */ + __get_inode_rdev(inode, ri); + +- err = __written_first_block(sbi, ri); +- if (err < 0) { +- f2fs_put_page(node_page, 1); +- return err; ++ if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) { ++ err = __written_first_block(sbi, ri); ++ if (err < 0) { ++ f2fs_put_page(node_page, 1); ++ return err; ++ } ++ if (!err) ++ set_inode_flag(inode, FI_FIRST_BLOCK_WRITTEN); + } +- if (!err) +- set_inode_flag(inode, FI_FIRST_BLOCK_WRITTEN); + + if (!need_inode_block_update(sbi, inode->i_ino)) + fi->last_disk_size = inode->i_size; -- 2.25.1