From 036df43d2a1d327370af005f861598d814c55121 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rich Felker Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:03:20 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix regression with compilers not incorporating C99 DR#289 resolution as originally published, the C99 syntax only allowed static index parameter declarators when a gratuitous parameter name was included. gcc 3, which some projects use for bootstrapping, is a supported C99 compiler, but does not have the fix to the standard incorporated, so edit the affected declaration to conform to the earlier buggy C99 syntax. --- src/internal/syscall.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/internal/syscall.h b/src/internal/syscall.h index da70ce92..06c5527f 100644 --- a/src/internal/syscall.h +++ b/src/internal/syscall.h @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ hidden long __syscall_ret(unsigned long), __syscall(syscall_arg_t, ...), #define __sys_open_cp(...) __SYSCALL_DISP(__sys_open_cp,,__VA_ARGS__) #define sys_open_cp(...) __syscall_ret(__sys_open_cp(__VA_ARGS__)) -hidden void __procfdname(char [static 15+3*sizeof(int)], unsigned); +hidden void __procfdname(char __buf[static 15+3*sizeof(int)], unsigned); hidden void *__vdsosym(const char *, const char *); -- 2.25.1