From: Patrick Delaunay Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 12:48:00 +0000 (+0200) Subject: dm: pinctrl: introduce PINCONF_RECURSIVE option X-Git-Tag: v2020.01-rc1~20^2~2 X-Git-Url: https://git.librecmc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e878b53a79d1;p=oweals%2Fu-boot.git dm: pinctrl: introduce PINCONF_RECURSIVE option In the Linux pinctrl binding, the pin configuration nodes don't need to be direct children of the pin controller device (may be grandchildren for example). This behavior is managed with the pinconfig u-class which recursively bind all the sub-node of the pin controller. But for some binding (when pin configuration is only children of pin controller) that is not necessary. U-Boot can save memory and reduce the number of pinconf instance when this feature is deactivated (for arch stm32mp for example for SPL). This patch allows to control this feature with a new option CONFIG_PINCONF_RECURSIVE when it is possible for each individual pin controller device. Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay Reviewed-by: Simon Glass Fixed CONFIG_IF_ENABLED() condition, added __maybe_unused: Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig index deee92411c..6b41f66a86 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig @@ -75,6 +75,22 @@ config PINCONF_RECURSIVE configuration; you can save memory footprint when this feature is no needed. +config PINCONF_RECURSIVE + bool "Support recursive binding for pin configuration nodes" + depends on PINCTRL_FULL + default n if ARCH_STM32MP + default y + help + In the Linux pinctrl binding, the pin configuration nodes need not be + direct children of the pin controller device (may be grandchildren for + example). It is define is each individual pin controller device. + Say Y here if you want to keep this behavior with the pinconfig + u-class: all sub are recursivelly bounded. + If the option is disabled, this behavior is deactivated and only + the direct children of pin controller will be assumed as pin + configuration; you can save memory footprint when this feature is + no needed. + config SPL_PINCTRL bool "Support pin controllers in SPL" depends on SPL && SPL_DM @@ -129,6 +145,15 @@ config SPL_PINCONF_RECURSIVE This option is an SPL-variant of the PINCONF_RECURSIVE option. See the help of PINCONF_RECURSIVE for details. +config SPL_PINCONF_RECURSIVE + bool "Support recursive binding for pin configuration nodes in SPL" + depends on SPL_PINCTRL_FULL + default n if ARCH_STM32MP + default y + help + This option is an SPL-variant of the PINCONF_RECURSIVE option. + See the help of PINCONF_RECURSIVE for details. + if PINCTRL || SPL_PINCTRL config PINCTRL_AR933X diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c index a2da63f598..0b1eb7fab4 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ int pinctrl_get_pin_muxing(struct udevice *dev, int selector, char *buf, * @dev: pinctrl device * @return: 0 on success, or negative error code on failure */ -static int pinctrl_post_bind(struct udevice *dev) +static int __maybe_unused pinctrl_post_bind(struct udevice *dev) { const struct pinctrl_ops *ops = pinctrl_get_ops(dev); @@ -426,7 +426,9 @@ static int pinctrl_post_bind(struct udevice *dev) UCLASS_DRIVER(pinctrl) = { .id = UCLASS_PINCTRL, +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(PINCONF_RECURSIVE) .post_bind = pinctrl_post_bind, +#endif .flags = DM_UC_FLAG_SEQ_ALIAS, .name = "pinctrl", };