From: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:42:08 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: As for inline vs. __inline. The original code implies that most compilers
X-Git-Tag: OpenSSL_0_9_8k^2~759
X-Git-Url: https://git.librecmc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1891f5b395038901ab05c54e82367cea44a3f846;p=oweals%2Fopenssl.git

As for inline vs. __inline. The original code implies that most compilers
understand inline, while WIN32 ones insist on __inline. Well, there are
other compilers that insist on __inline. At the same time it turned out
that most compilers understand both __inline and inline. I could find
only one that doesn't understand __inline, Sun C. In other words it seems
that __inline as preferred choice provides better coverage...
---

diff --git a/crypto/stack/safestack.h b/crypto/stack/safestack.h
index a2b0287217..f24353b131 100644
--- a/crypto/stack/safestack.h
+++ b/crypto/stack/safestack.h
@@ -60,11 +60,14 @@
 #ifndef OPENSSL_ALLOW_FCAST
 
 #ifndef OPENSSL_INLINE
-#ifdef OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32
-#define OPENSSL_INLINE __inline static
-#else
-#define OPENSSL_INLINE inline static
-#endif
+# if defined(__SUNPRO_C)
+#  if __SUNPRO_C>0x520
+#    define __inline inline
+#  else
+#    define __inline
+#  endif
+# endif
+# define OPENSSL_INLINE __inline static
 #endif
 
 #define STACK_OF(type) struct stack_st_##type