- correct comment.
authorBernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Fri, 3 Mar 2006 20:31:33 +0000 (20:31 -0000)
committerBernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Fri, 3 Mar 2006 20:31:33 +0000 (20:31 -0000)
Should revisit gcc >= 4.1 with that =1 later on

Rules.mak

index 1cab1f2fcb36d975531e2e64c7c74a733519547d..51c9baeab48304191b1844c09fbf1d5da78bca65 100644 (file)
--- a/Rules.mak
+++ b/Rules.mak
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ endif # arm
 $(if $(call is_eq,$(__TARGET_ARCH),i386),\
   $(call check_gcc,OPTIMIZATIONS,-march=i386,))
 
-# gcc-4.0 and older seem to suffer from these
+# gcc-4.0 and older seem to benefit from these
 $(if $(call cc_le,4,0),\
   $(call check_gcc,OPTIMIZATIONS,-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2,)\
   $(call check_gcc,OPTIMIZATIONS,-falign-functions=1 -falign-jumps=1 -falign-loops=1,\