Amir Shalem found some bugs in the new mount code; unknown options didn't get
authorRob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:07:49 +0000 (17:07 -0000)
committerRob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:07:49 +0000 (17:07 -0000)
added to the list, and my assumption that nfsmount() actually called
mount() was incorrect (and I coded it wrong anyway; I hate having to touch
codepaths I can't personally test).

util-linux/mount.c

index 35866ea763cf2e7d8c13280deee5a1648c69175d..05f25a70d2e0e4aa110575cac77462d3631439a3 100644 (file)
@@ -99,12 +99,12 @@ static void parse_mount_options(char *options, int *flags, char **strflags)
                        }
                }
                // Unrecognized mount option?
-               if(i == sizeof(mount_options)) {
+               if(i == (sizeof(mount_options) / sizeof(*mount_options))) {
                        // Add it to strflags, to pass on to kernel
                        i = *strflags ? strlen(*strflags) : 0;
                        *strflags = xrealloc(*strflags, i+strlen(options)+2);
                        // Comma separated if it's not the first one
-                       if(i) (*strflags)[i] = ',';
+                       if(i) (*strflags)[i++] = ',';
                        strcpy((*strflags)+i, options);
                }
                // Advance to next option, or finish
@@ -286,6 +286,8 @@ singlemount:
                        else {
                                rc = 0;
                                fsType="nfs";
+                               // Strangely enough, nfsmount() doesn't actually mount()
+                               goto mount_it_now;
                        }
                } else {