dm: core: Test uclass_first/next_device() on probe failure
authorSimon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:10:44 +0000 (20:10 -0600)
committerSimon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:08:19 +0000 (10:08 -0600)
Add some tests which check the behaviour of uclass_first_device() and
uclass_next_device() when probing of a device fails.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
arch/sandbox/dts/test.dts
include/dm/uclass-id.h
test/dm/test-fdt.c

index 7dde95d4b1e858fd12c881afb1617033e12e33f0..65b2f8ecdac037c136cc7f3c70ffe5473f76842e 100644 (file)
                };
        };
 
+       probing {
+               compatible = "simple-bus";
+               test1 {
+                       compatible = "denx,u-boot-probe-test";
+               };
+
+               test2 {
+                       compatible = "denx,u-boot-probe-test";
+               };
+
+               test3 {
+                       compatible = "denx,u-boot-probe-test";
+               };
+
+               test4 {
+                       compatible = "denx,u-boot-probe-test";
+               };
+       };
+
        pwrdom: power-domain {
                compatible = "sandbox,power-domain";
                #power-domain-cells = <1>;
index 1f7e32c31ff16872d42e7cdb83bed785a9996674..2e6498b7dcd1126444b930b7dae880ae530e6523 100644 (file)
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ enum uclass_id {
        UCLASS_TEST,
        UCLASS_TEST_FDT,
        UCLASS_TEST_BUS,
+       UCLASS_TEST_PROBE,
        UCLASS_SPI_EMUL,        /* sandbox SPI device emulator */
        UCLASS_I2C_EMUL,        /* sandbox I2C device emulator */
        UCLASS_PCI_EMUL,        /* sandbox PCI device emulator */
index 987a265ba90523b67cb7129168d6fb0cb73f70f4..7c9c5debe66d6f4739caa825405dd881a8bbc097 100644 (file)
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <dm/test.h>
 #include <dm/root.h>
+#include <dm/device-internal.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
 #include <dm/util.h>
 #include <test/ut.h>
@@ -99,6 +100,36 @@ UCLASS_DRIVER(testfdt) = {
        .flags          = DM_UC_FLAG_SEQ_ALIAS,
 };
 
+struct dm_testprobe_pdata {
+       int probe_err;
+};
+
+static int testprobe_drv_probe(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+       struct dm_testprobe_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
+
+       return pdata->probe_err;
+}
+
+static const struct udevice_id testprobe_ids[] = {
+       { .compatible = "denx,u-boot-probe-test" },
+       { }
+};
+
+U_BOOT_DRIVER(testprobe_drv) = {
+       .name   = "testprobe_drv",
+       .of_match       = testprobe_ids,
+       .id     = UCLASS_TEST_PROBE,
+       .probe  = testprobe_drv_probe,
+       .platdata_auto_alloc_size       = sizeof(struct dm_testprobe_pdata),
+};
+
+UCLASS_DRIVER(testprobe) = {
+       .name           = "testprobe",
+       .id             = UCLASS_TEST_PROBE,
+       .flags          = DM_UC_FLAG_SEQ_ALIAS,
+};
+
 int dm_check_devices(struct unit_test_state *uts, int num_devices)
 {
        struct udevice *dev;
@@ -267,3 +298,44 @@ static int dm_test_fdt_offset(struct unit_test_state *uts)
 }
 DM_TEST(dm_test_fdt_offset,
        DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA | DM_TESTF_SCAN_FDT | DM_TESTF_FLAT_TREE);
+
+/**
+ * Test various error conditions with uclass_first_device() and
+ * uclass_next_device()
+ */
+static int dm_test_first_next_device(struct unit_test_state *uts)
+{
+       struct dm_testprobe_pdata *pdata;
+       struct udevice *dev, *parent = NULL;
+       int count;
+       int ret;
+
+       /* There should be 4 devices */
+       for (ret = uclass_first_device(UCLASS_TEST_PROBE, &dev), count = 0;
+            dev;
+            ret = uclass_next_device(&dev)) {
+               count++;
+               parent = dev_get_parent(dev);
+               }
+       ut_assertok(ret);
+       ut_asserteq(4, count);
+
+       /* Remove them and try again, with an error on the second one */
+       ut_assertok(uclass_get_device(UCLASS_TEST_PROBE, 1, &dev));
+       pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
+       pdata->probe_err = -ENOMEM;
+       device_remove(parent, DM_REMOVE_NORMAL);
+       ut_assertok(uclass_first_device(UCLASS_TEST_PROBE, &dev));
+       ut_asserteq(-ENOMEM, uclass_next_device(&dev));
+       ut_asserteq_ptr(dev, NULL);
+
+       /* Now an error on the first one */
+       ut_assertok(uclass_get_device(UCLASS_TEST_PROBE, 0, &dev));
+       pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
+       pdata->probe_err = -ENOENT;
+       device_remove(parent, DM_REMOVE_NORMAL);
+       ut_asserteq(-ENOENT, uclass_first_device(UCLASS_TEST_PROBE, &dev));
+
+       return 0;
+}
+DM_TEST(dm_test_first_next_device, DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA | DM_TESTF_SCAN_FDT);