That statement seems to be not true. In fact, I have said that I would
authorUlf Möller <ulf@openssl.org>
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:22:58 +0000 (18:22 +0000)
committerUlf Möller <ulf@openssl.org>
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:22:58 +0000 (18:22 +0000)
like to use libtool, but not automake.

Let's investigate that further, or leave the question open for now.

FAQ

diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
index 5f41736a3fe5f8cc6c54d4392d9dcbd166147d1b..4702d6ac9b00950e7eb8a4ed96b633efc926dfe7 100644 (file)
--- a/FAQ
+++ b/FAQ
@@ -119,11 +119,6 @@ A number of Linux and *BSD distributions include OpenSSL.
 autoconf will probably be used in future OpenSSL versions. If it was
 less Unix-centric, it might have been used much earlier.
 
-libtool has repeatadly been reported by some members of the OpenSSL
-development and others to be a pain to use.  So far, those in the
-development team who have said anything about this have expressed
-a wish to avoid libtool for that reason.
-
 
 [LEGAL] =======================================================================