Last week I proposed to increase the version number to 1.0.

So far nobody complained...

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index f015f1113e3c640685e1cff6a3073ddb3bf787c7..6842a2719fa17a5b0b1bedef5169f30a1874672b 100644 (file)
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,28 +1,31 @@
 
   OpenSSL STATUS                           Last modified at
-  ______________                           $Date: 1999/04/23 22:20:21 $
+  ______________                           $Date: 1999/04/26 20:56:18 $
 
   DEVELOPMENT STATE
 
-    o  OpenSSL 0.9.3:  Under development...
+    o  OpenSSL 1.0:    Under development...
                        Proposed freeze  date: Mon May  8th, 1999
                        Proposed release date: Mon May 17th, 1999
     o  OpenSSL 0.9.2b: Released on March    22th, 1999
     o  OpenSSL 0.9.1c: Released on December 23th, 1998
 
+     [ Proposed new numbering scheme: <major>.<minor>[<patchlevel>]
+       0.9.1c is   0913
+       1.0    is 010000
+       1.0  a is 100001
+       1.8  z is 01081a ]
+
   RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS
 
     o Compilation warnings: ctype-related int vs. char
-    o Compilation error: "unsigned long*" and "int*" under AIX
     o BSD/OS: assembler functions must not have leading underscores
-       o exptest and rsa_oaep_test fail with irix64-*
+    o exptest and rsa_oaep_test fail with irix64-*
       (Don Badrak <dbadrak@geo.census.gov>: "Re: Problems to compile openssl
          on IRIX 6.2", openssl-users)
     o BN_add test fails on Caldera OpenLinux 1.3
       (Marc Christensen <Marc.Christensen@m.cc.utah.edu>
          "Compiles but fails big number test?", openssl-users)
-    o make test fails on AIX
-         (jvant@bsumail.idbsu.edu on openssl-users)
  
   AVAILABLE PATCHES