In longer tests with g=2, DH exchange does not become quite as fast
authorBodo Möller <bodo@openssl.org>
Sat, 10 Jun 2000 12:05:52 +0000 (12:05 +0000)
committerBodo Möller <bodo@openssl.org>
Sat, 10 Jun 2000 12:05:52 +0000 (12:05 +0000)
as expected -- maybe it's the different processor, maybe my
previous timings were too inaccurate.

CHANGES

diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES
index 8c5090c10152daa83be250c0a4b7c911716ce2dd..ec5b7c4d807dccf6fe70edc15c8895da8aef2661 100644 (file)
--- a/CHANGES
+++ b/CHANGES
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
           Free           =>  OPENSSL_free
      [Richard Levitte]
 
-  *) New function BN_mod_exp_mont_word for small bases (roughly 15-20%
-     faster than BN_mod_exp_mont, i.e. 7-10% for a full DH exchange).
+  *) New function BN_mod_exp_mont_word for small bases (roughly 15%
+     faster than BN_mod_exp_mont, i.e. 7% for a full DH exchange).
      [Bodo Moeller]
 
   *) CygWin32 support.