--- /dev/null
+From patchwork Sat Nov 2 17:47:01 2019
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
+X-Patchwork-Id: 11224189
+X-Patchwork-Delegate: kvalo@adurom.com
+Return-Path: <SRS0=CgQo=Y2=vger.kernel.org=linux-wireless-owner@kernel.org>
+Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 18:47:01 +0100
+From: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
+To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
+Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Roman Yeryomin <roman@advem.lv>,
+ wbob <wbob@jify.de>
+Subject: [PATCH v2] rt2800: remove errornous duplicate condition
+Message-ID: <20191102174701.GA1489@makrotopia.org>
+References: <20191102154639.GA4589@redhat.com>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Disposition: inline
+In-Reply-To: <20191102154639.GA4589@redhat.com>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
+Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
+Precedence: bulk
+List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>
+X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
+
+On 2019-10-28 06:07, wbob wrote:
+> Hello Roman,
+>
+> while reading around drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
+> I stumbled on what I think is an edit of yours made in error in march
+> 2017:
+>
+> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/41977e86#diff-dae5dc10da180f3b055809a48118e18aR5281
+>
+> RT6352 in line 5281 should not have been introduced as the "else if"
+> below line 5291 can then not take effect for a RT6352 device. Another
+> possibility is for line 5291 to be not for RT6352, but this seems
+> very unlikely. Are you able to clarify still after this substantial time?
+>
+> 5277: static int rt2800_init_registers(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
+> ...
+> 5279: } else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5390) ||
+> 5280: rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392) ||
+> 5281: rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) {
+> ...
+> 5291: } else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) {
+> ...
+
+Hence remove errornous line 5281 to make the driver actually
+execute the correct initialization routine for MT7620 chips.
+
+As it was requested by Stanislaw Gruszka remove setting values of
+MIMO_PS_CFG and TX_PIN_CFG. MIMO_PS_CFG is responsible for MIMO
+power-safe mode (which is disabled), hence we can drop setting it.
+TX_PIN_CFG is set correctly in other functions, and as setting this
+value breaks some devices, rather don't set it here during init, but
+only modify it later on.
+
+Fixes: 41977e86c984 ("rt2x00: add support for MT7620")
+Reported-by: wbob <wbob@jify.de>
+Reported-by: Roman Yeryomin <roman@advem.lv>
+Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
+Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
+---
+ drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 5 +----
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
++++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
+@@ -5839,8 +5839,7 @@ static int rt2800_init_registers(struct
+ rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_TXBF_CFG_0, 0x8000fc21);
+ rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_TXBF_CFG_3, 0x00009c40);
+ } else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5390) ||
+- rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392) ||
+- rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) {
++ rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392)) {
+ rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000404);
+ rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x00080606);
+ rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, 0x00000000);
+@@ -5854,8 +5853,6 @@ static int rt2800_init_registers(struct
+ rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000401);
+ rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x000C0000);
+ rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, 0x00000000);
+- rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, MIMO_PS_CFG, 0x00000002);
+- rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_PIN_CFG, 0x00150F0F);
+ rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_ALC_VGA3, 0x00000000);
+ rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX0_BB_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x0);
+ rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX1_BB_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x0);
projects / oweals / openwrt.git / commitdiff