I don't think this actually affects anything since the cfi_restore
directives aren't strictly needed anyway. (The old values are still in
memory so either will do.)
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2582)
mov -48(%rsi),%r15
.cfi_restore %r15
mov -40(%rsi),%r14
-.cfi_restore %r15
+.cfi_restore %r14
mov -32(%rsi),%r13
-.cfi_restore %r15
+.cfi_restore %r13
mov -24(%rsi),%r12
-.cfi_restore %r15
+.cfi_restore %r12
mov -16(%rsi),%rbp
-.cfi_restore %r15
+.cfi_restore %rbp
mov -8(%rsi),%rbx
-.cfi_restore %r15
+.cfi_restore %rbx
lea (%rsi),%rsp
.cfi_def_cfa_register %rsp
.Lmulx4x_epilogue:
mov -48(%rsi),%r15
.cfi_restore %r15
mov -40(%rsi),%r14
-.cfi_restore %r15
+.cfi_restore %r14
mov -32(%rsi),%r13
-.cfi_restore %r15
+.cfi_restore %r13
mov -24(%rsi),%r12
-.cfi_restore %r15
+.cfi_restore %r12
mov -16(%rsi),%rbp
-.cfi_restore %r15
+.cfi_restore %rbp
mov -8(%rsi),%rbx
-.cfi_restore %r15
+.cfi_restore %rbx
lea (%rsi),%rsp
.cfi_def_cfa_register %rsp
.Lmul_epilogue: