I <b>really</b> want to get BusyBox 1.0.0 released soon and I see no reason
real reason why the 1.0.0 release shouldn't happen with things pretty much as is.
- Remember, please do not bother to send in patches adding cool new features
+
+ I <b>really</b> want to get BusyBox 1.0.0 released soon and I see no real
+ reason why the 1.0.0 release shouldn't happen with things pretty much as
+ is. BusyBox is in good shape at the moment, and it works nicely for
+ everything that I'm doing with it. And from the reports I've been getting,
+ it works nicely for what most everyone else is doing with it as well.
+ There will eventually be a 1.0.1 anyway, so we might as well get on with
+ it. No BusyBox is not perfect. No piece of software ever is. And while
+ there is still plenty that can be done to improve things, most of that work
+ is waiting till we can get a solid 1.0.0 release out the door....
+ <p>
+
+ Please do not bother to send in patches adding cool new features
at this time. Only bug-fix patches will be accepted. It would also be
<b>very</b> helpful if people could continue to review the BusyBox
documentation and submit improvements.