Using memcpy() is, however tempting, not a good idea: It depends on the
specific implementation of memcpy, also lacks barriers. In this
particular case the first registers were written using 64-bit writes,
and the last register using four separate single-byte writes.
Replace the memcpy with a proper loop using the writel() accessor.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Tested-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
(struct sunxi_mctl_ctl_reg *)SUNXI_DRAM_CTL0_BASE;
struct sunxi_mctl_phy_reg * const mctl_phy =
(struct sunxi_mctl_phy_reg *)SUNXI_DRAM_PHY0_BASE;
+ int i;
u8 tccd = 2;
u8 tfaw = max(ns_to_t(50), 4);
u8 twr2rd = tcwl + 4 + 1 + twtr;
u8 trd2wr = tcl + 4 + (tcksrea >> 1) - tcwl + 1;
- /* set mode register */
- memcpy(mctl_phy->mr, mr_lpddr3, sizeof(mr_lpddr3));
+ /* set mode registers */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mr_lpddr3); i++)
+ writel(mr_lpddr3[i], &mctl_phy->mr[i]);
/* set DRAM timing */
writel((twtp << 24) | (tfaw << 16) | (trasmax << 8) | tras,