# achieves respectful 432MBps on 2.8GHz processor now. For reference.
# If executed on Xeon, current RC4_CHAR code-path is 2.7x faster than
# RC4_INT code-path. While if executed on Opteron, it's only 25%
-# slower slower than the RC4_INT one [meaning that if detecting CPU
-# is not desired, then RC4_CHAR code-path should be preferred, as it
-# provides better *all-round* performance].
+# slower than the RC4_INT one [meaning that if CPU ยต-arch detection
+# is not implemented, then this final RC4_CHAR code-path should be
+# preferred, as it provides better *all-round* performance].
$output=shift;
open STDOUT,"| $^X ../perlasm/x86_64-xlate.pl $output";
add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b
lea 1($XX[0]),$XX[1]
movzb ($dat,$YY),$TY#d
- movzb $XX[1]#b,$XX[1]
+ movzb $XX[1]#b,$XX[1]#d
movzb ($dat,$XX[1]),$TX[1]#d
movb $TX[0]#b,($dat,$YY)
cmp $XX[1],$YY