# Pentium III 7.8(*)
# Intel P4 7.5
#
-# Opteron 6.4/+14% # new MMX numbers
-# Core2 5.8/+50%(**)
-# Westmere 5.5/+80%(**)
-# Sandy Bridge 5.4/0%
+# Opteron 6.1/+20% # new MMX numbers
+# Core2 5.3/+67%(**)
+# Westmere 5.1/+94%(**)
+# Sandy Bridge 5.0/+8%
#
# (*) PIII can actually deliver 6.6 cycles per byte with MMX code,
# but this specific code performs poorly on Core2. And vice
$RC4_loop_mmx = sub {
my $i=shift;
- &add ($yy,$tx);
- &movz ($yy,&LB($yy)); # (*)
+ &add (&LB($yy),&LB($tx));
&psllq ("mm1",8*(($i-1)&7)) if (abs($i)!=1);
&mov ($ty,&DWP(0,$dat,$yy,4));
&mov (&DWP(0,$dat,$yy,4),$tx);
&$RC4_loop_mmx(0);
&set_label("loop_mmx_enter");
for ($i=1;$i<8;$i++) { &$RC4_loop_mmx($i); }
+ &mov ($ty,$yy);
+ &xor ($yy,$yy); # this is second key to Core2
+ &mov (&LB($yy),&LB($ty)); # and Westmere performance...
&cmp ($inp,&DWP(-4,$dat));
&lea ($inp,&DWP(8,$inp));
&jb (&label("loop_mmx"));