date: Use 64 prefix syscall if we have to
authorAlistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:28:49 +0000 (09:28 -0700)
committerDenys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Tue, 8 Oct 2019 14:31:54 +0000 (16:31 +0200)
commitb7b7452f292f03eefafa6fd1da9bcfc933dee15a
tree3471a263dc7420ae024a148b3d7ab7fb00baabf6
parent1f1988d5256c9705a4f296ed48cdb7e463525ba4
date: Use 64 prefix syscall if we have to

Some 32-bit architectures no longer have the 32-bit time_t syscalls.
Instead they have suffixed syscalls that returns a 64-bit time_t. If
the architecture doesn't have the non-suffixed syscall and is using a
64-bit time_t let's use the suffixed syscall instead.

This fixes build issues when building for RISC-V 32-bit with 5.1+ kernel
headers.

If an architecture only supports the suffixed syscalls, but is still
using a 32-bit time_t fall back to the libc call.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
coreutils/date.c