X-Git-Url: https://git.librecmc.org/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=shell%2Fhush_doc.txt;h=c68dc2416be089ccf482f9701e04a06435e0d92e;hb=1825e4f935f8e9ef9685766ab60659d78602c906;hp=973fe44c5d600bfba20e26f9181dab5be12fce48;hpb=0ef240d979b0ffcad104a6844cee4c72640844f5;p=oweals%2Fbusybox.git diff --git a/shell/hush_doc.txt b/shell/hush_doc.txt index 973fe44c5..c68dc2416 100644 --- a/shell/hush_doc.txt +++ b/shell/hush_doc.txt @@ -1,4 +1,108 @@ - This is how hush runs commands: +2008-07-14 + + Command parsing + +Command parsing results in a list of "pipe" structures. +This list correspond not only to usual "pipe1 || pipe2 && pipe3" +lists, but it also controls execution of if, while, etc statements. +Every such statement is a list for hush. List consists of pipes. + +struct pipe fields: + smallint res_word - "none" for normal commands, + "if" for if condition etc + struct child_prog progs[] - array of commands in pipe + smallint followup - how this pipe is related to next: is it + "pipe; pipe", "pipe & pipe" "pipe && pipe", + "pipe || pipe"? + +Blocks of commands { pipe; pipe; } and (pipe; pipe) are represented +as one pipe struct with one progs[0] element which is a "group" - +struct child_prog can contain a list of pipes. Sometimes these +"groups" are created implicitly, e.g. every control +statement (if, while, etc) sits inside its own group. + +res_word controls statement execution. Examples: + +"echo Hello" - +pipe 0 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ prog[0] 'echo' 'Hello' +pipe 1 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ + +"echo foo || echo bar" - +pipe 0 res_word=NONE followup=OR prog[0] 'echo' 'foo' +pipe 1 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ prog[0] 'echo' 'bar' +pipe 2 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ + +"if true; then echo Hello; true; fi" - +res_word=NONE followup=SEQ + prog 0 group {}: + pipe 0 res_word=IF followup=SEQ prog[0] 'true' + pipe 1 res_word=THEN followup=SEQ prog[0] 'echo' 'Hello' + pipe 2 res_word=THEN followup=SEQ prog[0] 'true' + pipe 3 res_word=FI followup=SEQ + pipe 4 res_word=NONE followup=(null) +pipe 1 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ + +Above you see that if is a list, and it sits in a {} group +implicitly created by hush. Also note two THEN res_word's - +it is explained below. + +"if true; then { echo Hello; true; }; fi" - +pipe 0 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ + prog 0 group {}: + pipe 0 res_word=IF followup=SEQ prog[0] 'true' + pipe 1 res_word=THEN followup=SEQ + prog 0 group {}: + pipe 0 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ prog[0] 'echo' 'Hello' + pipe 1 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ prog[0] 'true' + pipe 2 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ + pipe 2 res_word=NONE followup=(null) +pipe 1 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ + +"for v in a b; do echo $v; true; done" - +pipe 0 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ + prog 0 group {}: + pipe 0 res_word=FOR followup=SEQ prog[0] 'v' + pipe 1 res_word=IN followup=SEQ prog[0] 'a' 'b' + pipe 2 res_word=DO followup=SEQ prog[0] 'echo' '$v' + pipe 3 res_word=DO followup=SEQ prog[0] 'true' + pipe 4 res_word=DONE followup=SEQ + pipe 5 res_word=NONE followup=(null) +pipe 1 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ + +Note how "THEN" and "DO" does not just mark the first pipe, +it "sticks" to all pipes in the body. This is used when +hush executes parsed pipes. + +Dummy trailing pipes with no commands are artifacts of imperfect +parsing algorithm - done_pipe() appends new pipe struct beforehand +and last one ends up empty and unused. + +"for" and "case" statements (ab)use progs[] to keep their data +instead of argv vector progs[] usually do. "for" keyword is forcing +pipe termination after first word, which makes hush see +"for v in..." as "for v; in...". "case" keyword does the same. +Other judiciuosly placed hacks make hush see +"case word in a) cmd1;; b) cmd2;; esac" as if it was +"case word; match a; cmd; match b; cmd2; esac" +("match" is a fictitious keyword here): + +"case word in a) cmd1;; b) cmd2; esac" - +pipe 0 res_word=NONE followup=1 SEQ + prog 0 group {}: + pipe 0 res_word=CASE followup=SEQ prog[0] 'word' + pipe 1 res_word=MATCH followup=SEQ prog[0] 'a' + pipe 2 res_word=CASEI followup=SEQ prog[0] 'cmd1' + pipe 3 res_word=MATCH followup=SEQ prog[0] 'b' + pipe 4 res_word=CASEI followup=SEQ prog[0] 'cmd2' + pipe 5 res_word=CASEI followup=SEQ prog[0] 'cmd3' + pipe 6 res_word=ESAC followup=SEQ + pipe 7 res_word=NONE followup=(null) +pipe 1 res_word=NONE followup=SEQ + + +2008-01 + + Command execution /* callsite: process_command_subs */ generate_stream_from_list(struct pipe *head) - handles `cmds`