X-Git-Url: https://git.librecmc.org/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=STATUS;h=3948a8648861fd4e7173957399def90499fd1593;hb=c630a3e8d6d2ded0cf2b3c43f5b322a303f84c49;hp=672c900f6dddab8775789a190b6b2a8c1005161c;hpb=0424fe1a8f6341b271201835e55d6927228f5fe2;p=oweals%2Fopenssl.git

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 672c900f6d..3948a86488 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,10 +1,41 @@
 
   OpenSSL STATUS                           Last modified at
-  ______________                           $Date: 2002/05/16 09:28:09 $
+  ______________                           $Date: 2005/06/14 05:42:56 $
 
   DEVELOPMENT STATE
 
-    o  OpenSSL 0.9.7:  Under development...
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.9:  Under development...
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.8-beta5:  Released on June 13th, 2005
+       OpenVMS/Alpha 7.3-2 w. Compaq C 6.4-005			SUCCESS
+       Cygwin (1.5.17 and current CVS)				SUCCESS
+       linux-elf (SuSE 9.3)					SUCCESS
+       linux-? (Gentoo/armel)					SUCCESS
+       linux-? (Gentoo/armeb)					FAILURE
+		(Tester comment: Gentoo/armeb failed the x509 certificate test
+		 ('test_ss') due to lack of enough random data, but i'm pretty
+		 sure that's a system issue and unrelated to openssl ;))
+       linux-x86_64 (Linux AMD64)				SUCCESS
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.8-beta4:  Released on June 6th, 2005
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.8-beta3:  Released on May 31th, 2005
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.8-beta2:  Released on May 24th, 2005
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.8-beta1:  Released on May 19th, 2005
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.7g: Released on April     11th, 2005
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.7f: Released on March     22nd, 2005
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.7e: Released on October   25th, 2004
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.7d: Released on March     17th, 2004
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.7c: Released on September 30th, 2003
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.7b: Released on April     10th, 2003
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.7a: Released on February  19th, 2003
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.7:  Released on December  31st, 2002
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.6m: Released on March     17th, 2004
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.6l: Released on November   4th, 2003
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.6k: Released on September 30th, 2003
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.6j: Released on April     10th, 2003
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.6i: Released on February  19th, 2003
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.6h: Released on December   5th, 2002
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.6g: Released on August     9th, 2002
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.6f: Released on August     8th, 2002
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.6e: Released on July      30th, 2002
     o  OpenSSL 0.9.6d: Released on May        9th, 2002
     o  OpenSSL 0.9.6c: Released on December  21st, 2001
     o  OpenSSL 0.9.6b: Released on July       9th, 2001
@@ -18,12 +49,11 @@
     o  OpenSSL 0.9.2b: Released on March     22th, 1999
     o  OpenSSL 0.9.1c: Released on December  23th, 1998
 
-  [See also https://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/]
+  [See also http://www.openssl.org/support/rt2.html]
 
   RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS
 
-    o BN_mod_mul verification fails for mips3-sgi-irix
-      unless configured with no-asm
+    o 
 
   AVAILABLE PATCHES
 
@@ -39,28 +69,24 @@
 	Private key, certificate and CRL API and implementation.
 	Developing and bugfixing PKCS#7 (S/MIME code).
         Various X509 issues: character sets, certificate request extensions.
-    o Geoff and Richard are currently working on:
-	ENGINE (the new code that gives hardware support among others).
     o Richard is currently working on:
-	UI (User Interface)
-	UTIL (a new set of library functions to support some higher level
-	      functionality that is currently missing).
-	Shared library support for VMS.
-	Kerberos 5 authentication
 	Constification
-	OCSP
+	Attribute Certificate support
+	Certificate Pair support
+	Storage Engines (primarly an LDAP storage engine)
+	Certificate chain validation with full RFC 3280 compatibility
 
   NEEDS PATCH
 
+    o  0.9.8-dev: COMPLEMENTOFALL and COMPLEMENTOFDEFAULT do not
+       handle ECCdraft cipher suites correctly.
+
     o  apps/ca.c: "Sign the certificate?" - "n" creates empty certificate file
 
     o  "OpenSSL STATUS" is never up-to-date.
 
   OPEN ISSUES
 
-    o  Do we want the EVP API changes in 0.9.7?
-       Can compatibility be improved?
-
     o  The Makefile hierarchy and build mechanism is still not a round thing:
 
        1. The config vs. Configure scripts