testing "awk if string == " "awk 'BEGIN{if(\"a\"==\"ab\") print \"bar\"}'" "" "" ""
# 4294967295 = 0xffffffff
-testing "awk bitwise op" "awk '{ print or(4294967295,1) }'" "4.29497e+09\n" "" "\n"
+testing "awk bitwise op" "awk '{ print or(4294967295,1) }'" "4294967295\n" "" "\n"
+
+# we were testing for a non-empty body when deciding if a function was
+# defined or not. The testcase below caused:
+# awk: cmd. line:8: Call to undefined function
+prg='
+function empty_fun(count) {
+ # empty
+}
+END {
+ i=1
+ print "L" i "\n"
+ empty_fun(i + i + ++i)
+ print "L" i "\n"
+}'
+testing "awk handles empty function f(arg){}" \
+ "awk '$prg'" \
+ "L1\n\nL2\n\n" \
+ "" ""
+
+prg='
+function outer_fun() {
+ return 1
+}
+END {
+ i=1
+ print "L" i "\n"
+ i += outer_fun()
+ print "L" i "\n"
+}'
+testing "awk properly handles function from other scope" \
+ "awk '$prg'" \
+ "L1\n\nL2\n\n" \
+ "" ""
+
+prg='
+END {
+ i=1
+ print "L" i "\n"
+ i + trigger_error_fun()
+ print "L" i "\n"
+}'
+testing "awk properly handles undefined function" \
+ "awk '$prg' 2>&1" \
+ "L1\n\nawk: cmd. line:5: Call to undefined function\n" \
+ "" ""
+
+
optional DESKTOP
-testing "awk hex const 1" "awk '{ print or(0xffffffff,1) }'" "4.29497e+09\n" "" "\n"
-testing "awk hex const 2" "awk '{ print or(0x80000000,1) }'" "2.14748e+09\n" "" "\n"
+testing "awk hex const 1" "awk '{ print or(0xffffffff,1) }'" "4294967295\n" "" "\n"
+testing "awk hex const 2" "awk '{ print or(0x80000000,1) }'" "2147483649\n" "" "\n"
testing "awk oct const" "awk '{ print or(01234,1) }'" "669\n" "" "\n"
SKIP=
" \
"" ""
+prg='
+BEGIN{
+cnt = 0
+a[cnt] = "zeroth"
+a[++cnt] = "first"
+delete a[cnt--]
+print cnt
+print "[0]:" a[0]
+print "[1]:" a[1]
+}'
+testing "awk 'delete a[v--]' evaluates v-- once" \
+ "awk '$prg'" \
+ "\
+0
+[0]:zeroth
+[1]:
+" \
+ "" ""
+
testing "awk handles empty ()" \
"awk 'BEGIN {print()}' 2>&1" "awk: cmd. line:1: Empty sequence\n" "" ""
+testing "awk FS assignment" "awk '{FS=\":\"; print \$1}'" \
+ "a:b\ne\n" \
+ "" \
+ "a:b c:d\ne:f g:h"
+
+optional FEATURE_AWK_LIBM
+testing "awk large integer" \
+ "awk 'BEGIN{n=(2^31)-1; print n, int(n), n%1, ++n, int(n), n%1}'" \
+ "2147483647 2147483647 0 2147483648 2147483648 0\n" \
+ "" ""
+SKIP=
+
+testing "awk length(array)" \
+ "awk 'BEGIN{ A[1]=2; A[\"qwe\"]=\"asd\"; print length(A)}'" \
+ "2\n" \
+ "" ""
+
+testing "awk length()" \
+ "awk '{print length; print length(); print length(\"qwe\"); print length(99+9)}'" \
+ "3\n3\n3\n3\n" \
+ "" "qwe"
+
+testing "awk -f and ARGC" \
+ "awk -f - input" \
+ "re\n2\n" \
+ "do re mi\n" \
+ '{print $2; print ARGC;}' \
+
+optional FEATURE_AWK_GNU_EXTENSIONS
+testing "awk -e and ARGC" \
+ "awk -e '{print \$2; print ARGC;}' input" \
+ "re\n2\n" \
+ "do re mi\n" \
+ ""
+SKIP=
+
+# The examples are in fact not valid awk programs (break/continue
+# can only be used inside loops).
+# But we do accept them outside of loops.
+# We had a bug with misparsing "break ; else" sequence.
+# Test that *that* bug is fixed, using simplest possible scripts:
+testing "awk break" \
+ "awk -f - 2>&1; echo \$?" \
+ "0\n" \
+ "" \
+ 'BEGIN { if (1) break; else a = 1 }'
+testing "awk continue" \
+ "awk -f - 2>&1; echo \$?" \
+ "0\n" \
+ "" \
+ 'BEGIN { if (1) continue; else a = 1 }'
+
+testing "awk handles invalid for loop" \
+ "awk '{ for() }' 2>&1" "awk: cmd. line:1: Unexpected token\n" "" ""
+
+# testing "description" "command" "result" "infile" "stdin"
+
exit $FAILCOUNT