<ul>
+ <li><b>26 July 2004 -- BusyBox 1.0.0-rc2 released</b><p>
+
+ Here goes release candidate 2...
+ <p>
+ The <a href="downloads/Changelog">changelog</a> has all the details.
+ And as usual you can <a href="downloads">download busybox here</a>.
+
+ <p>Have Fun!
+
+ <p>
+ On a less happy note, My 92 year old grandmother (my dad's mom) passed away
+ yesterday (June 19th). The funeral will be Thursday in a little town about
+ 2 hours south of my home. I've checked and there is absolutely no way I
+ could be back in time for the funeral if I attend <a
+ href="http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2004/">OLS</a> and give my presentation
+ as scheduled.
+ <p>
+ As such, it is with great reluctance and sadness that I have come
+ to the conclusion I will have to make my appologies and skip OLS
+ this year.
+ <p>
+
+
+ <p>
<li><b>20 July 2004 -- BusyBox 1.0.0-rc1 released</b><p>
Here goes release candidate 1... This fixes all (most?) of the problems
kernel modules with 2.6.x kernels should be working much better.
<p>
- I <b>really</b> want to get BusyBox 1.0.0 released soon and I see no reason
- real reason why the 1.0.0 release shouldn't happen with things pretty much as is.
-
I <b>really</b> want to get BusyBox 1.0.0 released soon and I see no real
reason why the 1.0.0 release shouldn't happen with things pretty much as
is. BusyBox is in good shape at the moment, and it works nicely for