#define K_60_79 0xca62c1d6UL
/*
- * As pointed out by Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>, F() below can be simplified
- * to the code in F_00_19. Wei attributes these optimisations to Peter
- * Gutmann's SHS code, and he attributes it to Rich Schroeppel. #define
- * F(x,y,z) (((x) & (y)) | ((~(x)) & (z))) I've just become aware of another
- * tweak to be made, again from Wei Dai, in F_40_59, (x&a)|(y&a) -> (x|y)&a
+ * As pointed out by Wei Dai, F() below can be simplified to the code in
+ * F_00_19. Wei attributes these optimisations to Peter Gutmann's SHS code,
+ * and he attributes it to Rich Schroeppel.
+ * #define F(x,y,z) (((x) & (y)) | ((~(x)) & (z)))
+ * I've just become aware of another tweak to be made, again from Wei Dai,
+ * in F_40_59, (x&a)|(y&a) -> (x|y)&a
*/
#define F_00_19(b,c,d) ((((c) ^ (d)) & (b)) ^ (d))
#define F_20_39(b,c,d) ((b) ^ (c) ^ (d))
* "find" this expectation reasonable:-( On order to make such
* compilers generate better code I replace X[] with a bunch of
* X0, X1, etc. See the function body below...
- * <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
*/
# define X(i) XX##i
# else