* We _were_ going to split networking apps into a new package called
netkit-tiny. Per discussions on the mailing list, this isn't going
- to happen. False alarm. Sorry about the confusion.
+ to happen. False alarm. Sorry about the confusion.
+
+* The busybox shell, lash, is really too weak for serious use, although it is
+ possible to run many simple systems with it. BusyBox 0.49 was supposed to
+ have a new shell, updated to understand full Bourne grammar. Well, that
+ simply didn't happen in time for the release. A rewrite is in progress
+ that will result in a new shell that understands the full Bourne grammar.
+ This new shell is being championed by Larry Doolittle
+ <ldoolitt@recycle.lbl.gov>, and could use your help. Please see the work
+ in progress at http://doolittle.faludi.com/~larry/parser.html and help
+ us out.
-Erik
Possible apps to include some time:
* hwclock
-* stty
* group/commonize strings, remove dups (for i18n, l10n)
------------------------
+-----------
-The Busybox lash shell needs to be taught Bourne shell grammer. This
-is planned for the next release of Busybox. Look out ash, we are coming
-for you...
+Write a fixup_globals function to do just that right before calling
+non-forking applets. Or, just always fork in the shell...
-----------------------
-Running the following:
+Run the following:
rm -f busybox && make LDFLAGS+=-nostdlib 2>&1 | \
sed -ne 's/.*undefined reference to `\(.*\)..*/\1/gp' | sort | uniq
-----------------------
-Currently, busybox bypasses libc NSS. Some folks might want that,
-so perhaps adding in the option to choose whether to go to libc for
-things like getpwnam() or whether to use the busybox version might
-be nice.
-
------------------------
-
-Most wanted list:
-
- [andersen@slag busybox]$ grep -l getgroups *.[ch]
- test.c
-
-Policy violation. getgroups uses libc nss, which is unlikely
-to be present in an embedded system.
-
------------------------
-
Compile with debugging on, run 'nm --size-sort ./busybox'
and then start with the biggest things and make them smaller...
du.c probably ought to have an -x switch like GNU du does...
+-----------------------
+
+xargs could use a -l option
+
------------------------------------------------------------------