+/* Numeric release version identifier:
+ * MMNNFFPPS: major minor fix patch status
+ * The status nibble has one of the values 0 for development, 1 to e for betas
+ * 1 to 14, and f for release. The patch level is exactly that.
+ * For example:
+ * 0.9.3-dev 0x00903000
+ * 0.9.3-beta1 0x00903001
+ * 0.9.3-beta2-dev 0x00903002
+ * 0.9.3-beta2 0x00903002 (same as ...beta2-dev)
+ * 0.9.3 0x0090300f
+ * 0.9.3a 0x0090301f
+ * 0.9.4 0x0090400f
+ * 1.2.3z 0x102031af
+ *
+ * For continuity reasons (because 0.9.5 is already out, and is coded
+ * 0x00905100), between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6 the coding of the patch level
+ * part is slightly different, by setting the highest bit. This means
+ * that 0.9.5a looks like this: 0x0090581f. At 0.9.6, we can start
+ * with 0x0090600S...
+ *
+ * (Prior to 0.9.3-dev a different scheme was used: 0.9.2b is 0x0922.)
+ * (Prior to 0.9.5a beta1, a different scheme was used: MMNNFFRBB for
+ * major minor fix final patch/beta)
+ */
+#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x00905820L
+#define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT "OpenSSL 0.9.5b-dev 1 Apr 2000"