+diff
+ Make sure we handle empty files properly:
+ From the patch man page:
+
+ you can remove a file by sending out a context diff that compares
+ the file to be deleted with an empty file dated the Epoch. The
+ file will be removed unless patch is conforming to POSIX and the
+ -E or --remove-empty-files option is not given.
+---
+patch
+ Should have simple fuzz factor support to apply patches at an offset which
+ shouldn't take up too much space.
+
+ And while we're at it, a new patch filename quoting format is apparently
+ coming soon: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git&m=112927316408690&w=2
+---
+stty / catv
+ stty's visible() function and catv's guts are identical. Merge them into
+ an appropriate libbb function.
+---
+struct suffix_mult
+ Several duplicate users of: grep -r "1024\*1024" * -B2 -A1
+ Merge to a single size_suffixes[] in libbb.
+ Users: head tail od_bloaty hexdump and (partially as it wouldn't hurt) svlogd
+---
+tail
+ ./busybox tail -f foo.c~ TODO
+ should not print fmt=header_fmt for subsequent date >> TODO; i.e. only
+ fmt+ if another (not the current) file did change
+
+Architectural issues:
+
+bb_close() with fsync()
+ We should have a bb_close() in place of normal close, with a CONFIG_ option
+ to not just check the return value of close() for an error, but fsync().
+ Close can't reliably report anything useful because if write() accepted the
+ data then it either went out to the network or it's in cache or a pipe
+ buffer. Either way, there's no guarantee it'll make it to its final
+ destination before close() gets called, so there's no guarantee that any
+ error will be reported.
+
+ You need to call fsync() if you care about errors that occur after write(),
+ but that can have a big performance impact. So make it a config option.
+---
+Unify archivers
+ Lots of archivers have the same general infrastructure. The directory
+ traversal code should be factored out, and the guts of each archiver could
+ be some setup code and a series of callbacks for "add this file",
+ "add this directory", "add this symlink" and so on.
+
+ This could clean up tar and zip, and make it cheaper to add cpio and ar
+ write support, and possibly even cheaply add things like mkisofs or
+ mksquashfs someday, if they become relevant.
+---
+Text buffer support.
+ Several existing applets (sort, vi, less...) read
+ a whole file into memory and act on it. Use open_read_close().
+---
+Memory Allocation
+ We have a CONFIG_BUFFER mechanism that lets us select whether to do memory
+ allocation on the stack or the heap. Unfortunately, we're not using it much.
+ We need to audit our memory allocations and turn a lot of malloc/free calls
+ into RESERVE_CONFIG_BUFFER/RELEASE_CONFIG_BUFFER.
+ For a start, see e.g. make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-Wlarger-than-64
+
+ And while we're at it, many of the CONFIG_FEATURE_CLEAN_UP #ifdefs will be
+ optimized out by the compiler in the stack allocation case (since there's no
+ free for an alloca()), and this means that various cleanup loops that just
+ call free might also be optimized out by the compiler if written right, so
+ we can yank those #ifdefs too, and generally clean up the code.
+---
+FEATURE_CLEAN_UP
+ This is more an unresolved issue than a to-do item. More thought is needed.
+
+ Normally we rely on exit() to free memory, close files and unmap segments
+ for us. This makes most calls to free(), close(), and unmap() optional in
+ busybox applets that don't intend to run for very long, and optional stuff
+ can be omitted to save size.
+
+ The idea was raised that we could simulate fork/exit with setjmp/longjmp
+ for _really_ brainless embedded systems, or speed up the standalone shell
+ by not forking. Doing so would require a reliable FEATURE_CLEAN_UP.
+ Unfortunately, this isn't as easy as it sounds.
+
+ The problem is, lots of things exit(), sometimes unexpectedly (xmalloc())
+ and sometimes reliably (bb_perror_msg_and_die() or show_usage()). This
+ jumps out of the normal flow control and bypasses any cleanup code we
+ put at the end of our applets.
+
+ It's possible to add hooks to libbb functions like xmalloc() and xopen()
+ to add their entries to a linked list, which could be traversed and
+ freed/closed automatically. (This would need to be able to free just the
+ entries after a checkpoint to be usable for a forkless standalone shell.
+ You don't want to free the shell's own resources.)
+
+ Right now, FEATURE_CLEAN_UP is more or less a debugging aid, to make things
+ like valgrind happy. It's also documentation of _what_ we're trusting
+ exit() to clean up for us. But new infrastructure to auto-free stuff would
+ render the existing FEATURE_CLEAN_UP code redundant.
+
+ For right now, exit() handles it just fine.
+
+
+Minor stuff:
+ watchdog.c could autodetect the timer duration via:
+ if(!ioctl (fd, WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT, &tmo)) timer_duration = 1 + (tmo / 2);
+ Unfortunately, that needs linux/watchdog.h and that contains unfiltered
+ kernel types on some distros, which breaks the build.
+---
+ use bb_error_msg where appropriate: See
+ egrep "(printf.*\([[:space:]]*(stderr|2)|[^_]write.*\([[:space:]]*(stderr|2))"
+---
+ use bb_perror_msg where appropriate: See
+ egrep "[^_]perror"
+---
+ possible code duplication ingroup() and is_a_group_member()
+---
+ Move __get_hz() to a better place and (re)use it in route.c, ash.c
+---
+ See grep -r strtod
+ Alot of duplication that wants cleanup.
+---
+ in_ether duplicated in network/{interface,ifconfig}.c
+---
+ unify progress_meter. wget, flash_eraseall, pipe_progress, fbsplash, setfiles.
+---
+ support start-stop-daemon -d <chdir-path>
+---
+vdprintf() -> similar sized functionality
+---
+
+(TODO list after discussion 11.05.2009)
+
+* shrink tc/brctl/ip
+ tc/brctl seem like fairly large things to try and tackle in your timeframe,
+ and i think people have posted attempts in the past. Adding additional
+ options to ip though seems reasonable.
+
+* add tests for some applets
+
+* implement POSIX utilities and audit them for POSIX conformance. then
+ audit them for GNU conformance. then document all your findings in a new
+ doc/conformance.txt file while perhaps implementing some of the missing
+ features.
+ you can find the latest POSIX documentation (1003.1-2008) here:
+ http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
+ and the complete list of all utilities that POSIX covers:
+ http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/idx/utilities.html
+ The first step would to generate a file/matrix what is already archived
+ (also IPV6)
+
+* implement 'at'
+
+* rpcbind (former portmap) or equivalent
+ so that we don't have to use -o nolock on nfs mounts
+
+* check IPV6 compliance
+
+* generate a mini example using kernel+busybox only (+libc) for example
+
+* more support for advanced linux 2.6.x features, see: iotop
+ most likely there is more
+
+* even more support for statistics: mpstat, iostat, powertop....