+Stuff that needs to be done. This is organized by who plans to get around to
+doing it eventually, but that doesn't mean they "own" the item. If you want to
+do one of these bounce an email off the person it's listed under to see if they
+have any suggestions how they plan to go about it, and to minimize conflicts
+between your work and theirs. But otherwise, all of these are fair game.
+
+Rob Landley suggested this:
+ Implement bb_realpath() that can handle NULL on non-glibc.
+
+ sh
+ The command shell situation is a mess. We have two different
+ shells that don't really share any code, and the "standalone shell" doesn't
+ work all that well (especially not in a chroot environment), due to apps not
+ being reentrant.
+
+ Do a SUSv3 audit
+ Look at the full Single Unix Specification version 3 (available online at
+ "http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/nfindex.html") and
+ figure out which of our apps are compliant, and what we're missing that
+ we might actually care about.
+
+ Even better would be some kind of automated compliance test harness that
+ exercises each command line option and the various corner cases.
+
+ Internationalization
+ How much internationalization should we do?
+
+ The low hanging fruit is UTF-8 character set support. We should do this.
+ See TODO_unicode file.
+
+ We also have lots of hardwired english text messages. Consolidating this
+ into some kind of message table not only makes translation easier, but
+ also allows us to consolidate redundant (or close) strings.
+
+ We probably don't want to be bloated with locale support. (Not unless we
+ can cleanly export it from our underlying C library without having to
+ concern ourselves with it directly. Perhaps a few specific things like a
+ config option for "date" are low hanging fruit here?)
+
+ What level should things happen at? How much do we care about
+ internationalizing the text console when X11 and xterms are so much better
+ at it? (There's some infrastructure here we don't implement: The
+ "unicode_start" and "unicode_stop" shell scripts need "vt-is-UTF8" and a
+ --unicode option to loadkeys. That implies a real loadkeys/dumpkeys
+ implementation to replace loadkmap/dumpkmap. Plus messing with console font
+ loading. Is it worth it, or do we just say "use X"?)
+
+ Individual compilation of applets.
+ It would be nice if busybox had the option to compile to individual applets,
+ for people who want an alternate implementation less bloated than the gnu
+ utils (or simply with less political baggage), but without it being one big
+ executable.
+
+ Turning libbb into a real dll is another possibility, especially if libbb
+ could export some of the other library interfaces we've already more or less
+ got the code for (like zlib).
+
+ buildroot - Make a "dogfood" option
+ Busybox 1.1 will be capable of replacing most gnu packages for real world
+ use, such as developing software or in a live CD. It needs wider testing.
+
+ Busybox should now be able to replace bzip2, coreutils, e2fsprogs, file,
+ findutils, gawk, grep, inetutils, less, modutils, net-tools, patch, procps,
+ sed, shadow, sysklogd, sysvinit, tar, util-linux, and vim. The resulting
+ system should be self-hosting (I.E. able to rebuild itself from source
+ code). This means it would need (at least) binutils, gcc, and make, or
+ equivalents.
+
+ It would be a good "eating our own dogfood" test if buildroot had the option
+ of using a "make allyesconfig" busybox instead of the all of the above
+ packages. Anything that's wrong with the resulting system, we can fix. (It
+ would be nice to be able to upgrade busybox to be able to replace bash and
+ diffutils as well, but we're not there yet.)
+
+ One example of an existing system that does this already is Firmware Linux:
+ http://www.landley.net/code/firmware
+
+ initramfs
+ Busybox should have a sample initramfs build script. This depends on
+ shell, mdev, and switch_root.
+
+ mkdep
+ Write a mkdep that doesn't segfault if there's a directory it doesn't
+ have permission to read, isn't based on manually editing the output of
+ lexx and yacc, doesn't make such a mess under include/config, etc.
+
+ Group globals into unions of structures.
+ Go through and turn all the global and static variables into structures,
+ and have all those structures be in a big union shared between processes,
+ so busybox uses less bss. (This is a big win on nommu machines.) See
+ sed.c and mdev.c for examples.
+
+ Go through bugs.busybox.net and close out all of that somehow.
+ This one's open to everybody, but I'll wind up doing it...
+
+Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <busybox@busybox.net> suggests to look at these:
+ New debug options:
+ -Wlarger-than-127
+ Cleanup any big users
+ Collate BUFSIZ IOBUF_SIZE MY_BUF_SIZE PIPE_PROGRESS_SIZE BUFSIZE PIPESIZE
+ make bb_common_bufsiz1 configurable, size wise.
+ make pipesize configurable, size wise.
+ Use bb_common_bufsiz1 throughout applets!
+
+As yet unclaimed:
+
+----