+ If you are unsure as to whether a feature will be useful for the general
+ OpenSSL community please discuss it on the openssl-dev mailing list first.
+ Someone may be already working on the same thing or there may be a good
+ reason as to why that feature isn't implemented.
+
+ Patches should be as up to date as possible, preferably relative to the
+ current CVS or the last snapshot. They should follow the coding style of
+ OpenSSL and compile without warnings. Some of the core team developer targets
+ can be used for testing purposes, (debug-steve64, debug-geoff etc). OpenSSL
+ compiles on many varied platforms: try to ensure you only use portable
+ features.
+
+ Note: For legal reasons, contributions from the US can be accepted only
+ if a TSU notification and a copy of the patch are sent to crypt@bis.doc.gov
+ (formerly BXA) with a copy to the ENC Encryption Request Coordinator;
+ please take some time to look at
+ http://www.bis.doc.gov/Encryption/PubAvailEncSourceCodeNofify.html [sic]
+ and
+ http://w3.access.gpo.gov/bis/ear/pdf/740.pdf (EAR Section 740.13(e))
+ for the details. If "your encryption source code is too large to serve as
+ an email attachment", they are glad to receive it by fax instead; hope you
+ have a cheap long-distance plan.
+
+ Our preferred format for changes is "diff -u" output. You might