1 OpenSSL - Frequently Asked Questions
2 --------------------------------------
4 [MISC] Miscellaneous questions
6 * Which is the current version of OpenSSL?
7 * Where is the documentation?
8 * How can I contact the OpenSSL developers?
9 * Where can I get a compiled version of OpenSSL?
10 * Why aren't tools like 'autoconf' and 'libtool' used?
11 * What is an 'engine' version?
12 * How do I check the authenticity of the OpenSSL distribution?
13 * How does the versioning scheme work?
15 [LEGAL] Legal questions
17 * Do I need patent licenses to use OpenSSL?
18 * Can I use OpenSSL with GPL software?
20 [USER] Questions on using the OpenSSL applications
22 * Why do I get a "PRNG not seeded" error message?
23 * Why do I get an "unable to write 'random state'" error message?
24 * How do I create certificates or certificate requests?
25 * Why can't I create certificate requests?
26 * Why does <SSL program> fail with a certificate verify error?
27 * Why can I only use weak ciphers when I connect to a server using OpenSSL?
28 * How can I create DSA certificates?
29 * Why can't I make an SSL connection using a DSA certificate?
30 * How can I remove the passphrase on a private key?
31 * Why can't I use OpenSSL certificates with SSL client authentication?
32 * Why does my browser give a warning about a mismatched hostname?
33 * How do I install a CA certificate into a browser?
34 * Why is OpenSSL x509 DN output not conformant to RFC2253?
35 * What is a "128 bit certificate"? Can I create one with OpenSSL?
36 * Why does OpenSSL set the authority key identifier extension incorrectly?
37 * How can I set up a bundle of commercial root CA certificates?
39 [BUILD] Questions about building and testing OpenSSL
41 * Why does the linker complain about undefined symbols?
42 * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: command not found"?
43 * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"?
44 * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: stack empty"?
45 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha Tru64 Unix?
46 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail with "ar: command not found"?
47 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Win32 with VC++?
48 * What is special about OpenSSL on Redhat?
49 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on MacOS X?
50 * Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail on MacOS X?
51 * Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in BN_sqr test [on a 64-bit platform]?
52 * Why does OpenBSD-i386 build fail on des-586.s with "Unimplemented segment type"?
53 * Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in sha512t on x86 CPU?
54 * Why does compiler fail to compile sha512.c?
55 * Test suite still fails, what to do?
56 * I think I've found a bug, what should I do?
57 * I'm SURE I've found a bug, how do I report it?
58 * I've found a security issue, how do I report it?
60 [PROG] Questions about programming with OpenSSL
62 * Is OpenSSL thread-safe?
63 * I've compiled a program under Windows and it crashes: why?
64 * How do I read or write a DER encoded buffer using the ASN1 functions?
65 * OpenSSL uses DER but I need BER format: does OpenSSL support BER?
66 * I've tried using <M_some_evil_pkcs12_macro> and I get errors why?
67 * I've called <some function> and it fails, why?
68 * I just get a load of numbers for the error output, what do they mean?
69 * Why do I get errors about unknown algorithms?
70 * Why can't the OpenSSH configure script detect OpenSSL?
71 * Can I use OpenSSL's SSL library with non-blocking I/O?
72 * Why doesn't my server application receive a client certificate?
73 * Why does compilation fail due to an undefined symbol NID_uniqueIdentifier?
74 * I think I've detected a memory leak, is this a bug?
75 * Why does Valgrind complain about the use of uninitialized data?
76 * Why doesn't a memory BIO work when a file does?
77 * Where are the declarations and implementations of d2i_X509() etc?
79 ===============================================================================
81 [MISC] ========================================================================
83 * Which is the current version of OpenSSL?
85 The current version is available from <URL: http://www.openssl.org>.
86 OpenSSL 1.0.1e was released on Feb 11, 2013.
88 In addition to the current stable release, you can also access daily
89 snapshots of the OpenSSL development version at <URL:
90 ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot/>, or get it by anonymous Git access.
93 * Where is the documentation?
95 OpenSSL is a library that provides cryptographic functionality to
96 applications such as secure web servers. Be sure to read the
97 documentation of the application you want to use. The INSTALL file
98 explains how to install this library.
100 OpenSSL includes a command line utility that can be used to perform a
101 variety of cryptographic functions. It is described in the openssl(1)
102 manpage. Documentation for developers is currently being written. Many
103 manual pages are available; overviews over libcrypto and
104 libssl are given in the crypto(3) and ssl(3) manpages.
106 The OpenSSL manpages are installed in /usr/local/ssl/man/ (or a
107 different directory if you specified one as described in INSTALL).
108 In addition, you can read the most current versions at
109 <URL: http://www.openssl.org/docs/>. Note that the online documents refer
110 to the very latest development versions of OpenSSL and may include features
111 not present in released versions. If in doubt refer to the documentation
112 that came with the version of OpenSSL you are using. The pod format
113 documentation is included in each OpenSSL distribution under the docs
116 For information on parts of libcrypto that are not yet documented, you
117 might want to read Ariel Glenn's documentation on SSLeay 0.9, OpenSSL's
118 predecessor, at <URL: http://www.columbia.edu/~ariel/ssleay/>. Much
119 of this still applies to OpenSSL.
121 There is some documentation about certificate extensions and PKCS#12
124 The original SSLeay documentation is included in OpenSSL as
125 doc/ssleay.txt. It may be useful when none of the other resources
126 help, but please note that it reflects the obsolete version SSLeay
130 * How can I contact the OpenSSL developers?
132 The README file describes how to submit bug reports and patches to
133 OpenSSL. Information on the OpenSSL mailing lists is available from
134 <URL: http://www.openssl.org>.
137 * Where can I get a compiled version of OpenSSL?
139 You can finder pointers to binary distributions in
140 <URL: http://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html> .
142 Some applications that use OpenSSL are distributed in binary form.
143 When using such an application, you don't need to install OpenSSL
144 yourself; the application will include the required parts (e.g. DLLs).
146 If you want to build OpenSSL on a Windows system and you don't have
147 a C compiler, read the "Mingw32" section of INSTALL.W32 for information
148 on how to obtain and install the free GNU C compiler.
150 A number of Linux and *BSD distributions include OpenSSL.
153 * Why aren't tools like 'autoconf' and 'libtool' used?
155 autoconf will probably be used in future OpenSSL versions. If it was
156 less Unix-centric, it might have been used much earlier.
158 * What is an 'engine' version?
160 With version 0.9.6 OpenSSL was extended to interface to external crypto
161 hardware. This was realized in a special release '0.9.6-engine'. With
162 version 0.9.7 the changes were merged into the main development line,
163 so that the special release is no longer necessary.
165 * How do I check the authenticity of the OpenSSL distribution?
167 We provide MD5 digests and ASC signatures of each tarball.
168 Use MD5 to check that a tarball from a mirror site is identical:
170 md5sum TARBALL | awk '{print $1;}' | cmp - TARBALL.md5
172 You can check authenticity using pgp or gpg. You need the OpenSSL team
173 member public key used to sign it (download it from a key server, see a
174 list of keys at <URL: http://www.openssl.org/about/>). Then
179 * How does the versioning scheme work?
181 After the release of OpenSSL 1.0.0 the versioning scheme changed. Letter
182 releases (e.g. 1.0.1a) can only contain bug and security fixes and no
183 new features. Minor releases change the last number (e.g. 1.0.2) and
184 can contain new features that retain binary compatibility. Changes to
185 the middle number are considered major releases and neither source nor
186 binary compatibility is guaranteed.
188 Therefore the answer to the common question "when will feature X be
189 backported to OpenSSL 1.0.0/0.9.8?" is "never" but it could appear
190 in the next minor release.
192 * What happens when the letter release reaches z?
194 It was decided after the release of OpenSSL 0.9.8y the next version should
195 be 0.9.8za then 0.9.8zb and so on.
198 [LEGAL] =======================================================================
200 * Do I need patent licenses to use OpenSSL?
202 The patents section of the README file lists patents that may apply to
203 you if you want to use OpenSSL. For information on intellectual
204 property rights, please consult a lawyer. The OpenSSL team does not
207 You can configure OpenSSL so as not to use IDEA, MDC2 and RC5 by using
208 ./config no-idea no-mdc2 no-rc5
211 * Can I use OpenSSL with GPL software?
213 On many systems including the major Linux and BSD distributions, yes (the
214 GPL does not place restrictions on using libraries that are part of the
215 normal operating system distribution).
217 On other systems, the situation is less clear. Some GPL software copyright
218 holders claim that you infringe on their rights if you use OpenSSL with
219 their software on operating systems that don't normally include OpenSSL.
221 If you develop open source software that uses OpenSSL, you may find it
222 useful to choose an other license than the GPL, or state explicitly that
223 "This program is released under the GPL with the additional exemption that
224 compiling, linking, and/or using OpenSSL is allowed." If you are using
225 GPL software developed by others, you may want to ask the copyright holder
226 for permission to use their software with OpenSSL.
229 [USER] ========================================================================
231 * Why do I get a "PRNG not seeded" error message?
233 Cryptographic software needs a source of unpredictable data to work
234 correctly. Many open source operating systems provide a "randomness
235 device" (/dev/urandom or /dev/random) that serves this purpose.
236 All OpenSSL versions try to use /dev/urandom by default; starting with
237 version 0.9.7, OpenSSL also tries /dev/random if /dev/urandom is not
240 On other systems, applications have to call the RAND_add() or
241 RAND_seed() function with appropriate data before generating keys or
242 performing public key encryption. (These functions initialize the
243 pseudo-random number generator, PRNG.) Some broken applications do
244 not do this. As of version 0.9.5, the OpenSSL functions that need
245 randomness report an error if the random number generator has not been
246 seeded with at least 128 bits of randomness. If this error occurs and
247 is not discussed in the documentation of the application you are
248 using, please contact the author of that application; it is likely
249 that it never worked correctly. OpenSSL 0.9.5 and later make the
250 error visible by refusing to perform potentially insecure encryption.
252 If you are using Solaris 8, you can add /dev/urandom and /dev/random
253 devices by installing patch 112438 (Sparc) or 112439 (x86), which are
254 available via the Patchfinder at <URL: http://sunsolve.sun.com>
255 (Solaris 9 includes these devices by default). For /dev/random support
256 for earlier Solaris versions, see Sun's statement at
257 <URL: http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsrdb/27606&zone_32=SUNWski>
258 (the SUNWski package is available in patch 105710).
260 On systems without /dev/urandom and /dev/random, it is a good idea to
261 use the Entropy Gathering Demon (EGD); see the RAND_egd() manpage for
262 details. Starting with version 0.9.7, OpenSSL will automatically look
263 for an EGD socket at /var/run/egd-pool, /dev/egd-pool, /etc/egd-pool and
266 Most components of the openssl command line utility automatically try
267 to seed the random number generator from a file. The name of the
268 default seeding file is determined as follows: If environment variable
269 RANDFILE is set, then it names the seeding file. Otherwise if
270 environment variable HOME is set, then the seeding file is $HOME/.rnd.
271 If neither RANDFILE nor HOME is set, versions up to OpenSSL 0.9.6 will
272 use file .rnd in the current directory while OpenSSL 0.9.6a uses no
273 default seeding file at all. OpenSSL 0.9.6b and later will behave
274 similarly to 0.9.6a, but will use a default of "C:\" for HOME on
275 Windows systems if the environment variable has not been set.
277 If the default seeding file does not exist or is too short, the "PRNG
278 not seeded" error message may occur.
280 The openssl command line utility will write back a new state to the
281 default seeding file (and create this file if necessary) unless
282 there was no sufficient seeding.
284 Pointing $RANDFILE to an Entropy Gathering Daemon socket does not work.
285 Use the "-rand" option of the OpenSSL command line tools instead.
286 The $RANDFILE environment variable and $HOME/.rnd are only used by the
287 OpenSSL command line tools. Applications using the OpenSSL library
288 provide their own configuration options to specify the entropy source,
289 please check out the documentation coming the with application.
292 * Why do I get an "unable to write 'random state'" error message?
295 Sometimes the openssl command line utility does not abort with
296 a "PRNG not seeded" error message, but complains that it is
297 "unable to write 'random state'". This message refers to the
298 default seeding file (see previous answer). A possible reason
299 is that no default filename is known because neither RANDFILE
300 nor HOME is set. (Versions up to 0.9.6 used file ".rnd" in the
301 current directory in this case, but this has changed with 0.9.6a.)
304 * How do I create certificates or certificate requests?
306 Check out the CA.pl(1) manual page. This provides a simple wrapper round
307 the 'req', 'verify', 'ca' and 'pkcs12' utilities. For finer control check
308 out the manual pages for the individual utilities and the certificate
309 extensions documentation (in ca(1), req(1), x509v3_config(5) )
312 * Why can't I create certificate requests?
314 You typically get the error:
316 unable to find 'distinguished_name' in config
317 problems making Certificate Request
319 This is because it can't find the configuration file. Check out the
320 DIAGNOSTICS section of req(1) for more information.
323 * Why does <SSL program> fail with a certificate verify error?
325 This problem is usually indicated by log messages saying something like
326 "unable to get local issuer certificate" or "self signed certificate".
327 When a certificate is verified its root CA must be "trusted" by OpenSSL
328 this typically means that the CA certificate must be placed in a directory
329 or file and the relevant program configured to read it. The OpenSSL program
330 'verify' behaves in a similar way and issues similar error messages: check
331 the verify(1) program manual page for more information.
334 * Why can I only use weak ciphers when I connect to a server using OpenSSL?
336 This is almost certainly because you are using an old "export grade" browser
337 which only supports weak encryption. Upgrade your browser to support 128 bit
341 * How can I create DSA certificates?
343 Check the CA.pl(1) manual page for a DSA certificate example.
346 * Why can't I make an SSL connection to a server using a DSA certificate?
348 Typically you'll see a message saying there are no shared ciphers when
349 the same setup works fine with an RSA certificate. There are two possible
350 causes. The client may not support connections to DSA servers most web
351 browsers (including Netscape and MSIE) only support connections to servers
352 supporting RSA cipher suites. The other cause is that a set of DH parameters
353 has not been supplied to the server. DH parameters can be created with the
354 dhparam(1) command and loaded using the SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh() for example:
355 check the source to s_server in apps/s_server.c for an example.
358 * How can I remove the passphrase on a private key?
360 Firstly you should be really *really* sure you want to do this. Leaving
361 a private key unencrypted is a major security risk. If you decide that
362 you do have to do this check the EXAMPLES sections of the rsa(1) and
366 * Why can't I use OpenSSL certificates with SSL client authentication?
368 What will typically happen is that when a server requests authentication
369 it will either not include your certificate or tell you that you have
370 no client certificates (Netscape) or present you with an empty list box
371 (MSIE). The reason for this is that when a server requests a client
372 certificate it includes a list of CAs names which it will accept. Browsers
373 will only let you select certificates from the list on the grounds that
374 there is little point presenting a certificate which the server will
377 The solution is to add the relevant CA certificate to your servers "trusted
378 CA list". How you do this depends on the server software in uses. You can
379 print out the servers list of acceptable CAs using the OpenSSL s_client tool:
381 openssl s_client -connect www.some.host:443 -prexit
383 If your server only requests certificates on certain URLs then you may need
384 to manually issue an HTTP GET command to get the list when s_client connects:
386 GET /some/page/needing/a/certificate.html
388 If your CA does not appear in the list then this confirms the problem.
391 * Why does my browser give a warning about a mismatched hostname?
393 Browsers expect the server's hostname to match the value in the commonName
394 (CN) field of the certificate. If it does not then you get a warning.
397 * How do I install a CA certificate into a browser?
399 The usual way is to send the DER encoded certificate to the browser as
400 MIME type application/x-x509-ca-cert, for example by clicking on an appropriate
401 link. On MSIE certain extensions such as .der or .cacert may also work, or you
402 can import the certificate using the certificate import wizard.
404 You can convert a certificate to DER form using the command:
406 openssl x509 -in ca.pem -outform DER -out ca.der
408 Occasionally someone suggests using a command such as:
410 openssl pkcs12 -export -out cacert.p12 -in cacert.pem -inkey cakey.pem
412 DO NOT DO THIS! This command will give away your CAs private key and
413 reduces its security to zero: allowing anyone to forge certificates in
414 whatever name they choose.
416 * Why is OpenSSL x509 DN output not conformant to RFC2253?
418 The ways to print out the oneline format of the DN (Distinguished Name) have
419 been extended in version 0.9.7 of OpenSSL. Using the new X509_NAME_print_ex()
420 interface, the "-nameopt" option could be introduded. See the manual
421 page of the "openssl x509" commandline tool for details. The old behaviour
422 has however been left as default for the sake of compatibility.
424 * What is a "128 bit certificate"? Can I create one with OpenSSL?
426 The term "128 bit certificate" is a highly misleading marketing term. It does
427 *not* refer to the size of the public key in the certificate! A certificate
428 containing a 128 bit RSA key would have negligible security.
430 There were various other names such as "magic certificates", "SGC
431 certificates", "step up certificates" etc.
433 You can't generally create such a certificate using OpenSSL but there is no
434 need to any more. Nowadays web browsers using unrestricted strong encryption
435 are generally available.
437 When there were tight restrictions on the export of strong encryption
438 software from the US only weak encryption algorithms could be freely exported
439 (initially 40 bit and then 56 bit). It was widely recognised that this was
440 inadequate. A relaxation of the rules allowed the use of strong encryption but
441 only to an authorised server.
443 Two slighly different techniques were developed to support this, one used by
444 Netscape was called "step up", the other used by MSIE was called "Server Gated
445 Cryptography" (SGC). When a browser initially connected to a server it would
446 check to see if the certificate contained certain extensions and was issued by
447 an authorised authority. If these test succeeded it would reconnect using
450 Only certain (initially one) certificate authorities could issue the
451 certificates and they generally cost more than ordinary certificates.
453 Although OpenSSL can create certificates containing the appropriate extensions
454 the certificate would not come from a permitted authority and so would not
457 The export laws were later changed to allow almost unrestricted use of strong
458 encryption so these certificates are now obsolete.
461 * Why does OpenSSL set the authority key identifier (AKID) extension incorrectly?
463 It doesn't: this extension is often the cause of confusion.
465 Consider a certificate chain A->B->C so that A signs B and B signs C. Suppose
466 certificate C contains AKID.
468 The purpose of this extension is to identify the authority certificate B. This
469 can be done either by including the subject key identifier of B or its issuer
470 name and serial number.
472 In this latter case because it is identifying certifcate B it must contain the
473 issuer name and serial number of B.
475 It is often wrongly assumed that it should contain the subject name of B. If it
476 did this would be redundant information because it would duplicate the issuer
480 * How can I set up a bundle of commercial root CA certificates?
482 The OpenSSL software is shipped without any root CA certificate as the
483 OpenSSL project does not have any policy on including or excluding
484 any specific CA and does not intend to set up such a policy. Deciding
485 about which CAs to support is up to application developers or
488 Other projects do have other policies so you can for example extract the CA
489 bundle used by Mozilla and/or modssl as described in this article:
491 <URL: http://www.mail-archive.com/modssl-users@modssl.org/msg16980.html>
494 [BUILD] =======================================================================
496 * Why does the linker complain about undefined symbols?
498 Maybe the compilation was interrupted, and make doesn't notice that
499 something is missing. Run "make clean; make".
501 If you used ./Configure instead of ./config, make sure that you
502 selected the right target. File formats may differ slightly between
503 OS versions (for example sparcv8/sparcv9, or a.out/elf).
505 In case you get errors about the following symbols, use the config
506 option "no-asm", as described in INSTALL:
508 BF_cbc_encrypt, BF_decrypt, BF_encrypt, CAST_cbc_encrypt,
509 CAST_decrypt, CAST_encrypt, RC4, RC5_32_cbc_encrypt, RC5_32_decrypt,
510 RC5_32_encrypt, bn_add_words, bn_div_words, bn_mul_add_words,
511 bn_mul_comba4, bn_mul_comba8, bn_mul_words, bn_sqr_comba4,
512 bn_sqr_comba8, bn_sqr_words, bn_sub_words, des_decrypt3,
513 des_ede3_cbc_encrypt, des_encrypt, des_encrypt2, des_encrypt3,
514 des_ncbc_encrypt, md5_block_asm_host_order, sha1_block_asm_data_order
516 If none of these helps, you may want to try using the current snapshot.
517 If the problem persists, please submit a bug report.
520 * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: command not found"?
522 You didn't install "bc", the Unix calculator. If you want to run the
523 tests, get GNU bc from ftp://ftp.gnu.org or from your OS distributor.
526 * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"?
528 On some SCO installations or versions, bc has a bug that gets triggered
529 when you run the test suite (using "make test"). The message returned is
530 "bc: 1 not implemented".
532 The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc
533 and compile/install it. GNU bc (see <URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html>
534 for download instructions) can be safely used, for example.
537 * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: stack empty"?
539 On some DG/ux versions, bc seems to have a too small stack for calculations
540 that the OpenSSL bntest throws at it. This gets triggered when you run the
541 test suite (using "make test"). The message returned is "bc: stack empty".
543 The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc
544 and compile/install it. GNU bc (see <URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html>
545 for download instructions) can be safely used, for example.
548 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha Tru64 Unix?
550 On some Alpha installations running Tru64 Unix and Compaq C, the compilation
551 of crypto/sha/sha_dgst.c fails with the message 'Fatal: Insufficient virtual
552 memory to continue compilation.' As far as the tests have shown, this may be
553 a compiler bug. What happens is that it eats up a lot of resident memory
554 to build something, probably a table. The problem is clearly in the
555 optimization code, because if one eliminates optimization completely (-O0),
556 the compilation goes through (and the compiler consumes about 2MB of resident
557 memory instead of 240MB or whatever one's limit is currently).
559 There are three options to solve this problem:
561 1. set your current data segment size soft limit higher. Experience shows
562 that about 241000 kbytes seems to be enough on an AlphaServer DS10. You do
563 this with the command 'ulimit -Sd nnnnnn', where 'nnnnnn' is the number of
564 kbytes to set the limit to.
566 2. If you have a hard limit that is lower than what you need and you can't
567 get it changed, you can compile all of OpenSSL with -O0 as optimization
568 level. This is however not a very nice thing to do for those who expect to
569 get the best result from OpenSSL. A bit more complicated solution is the
572 ----- snip:start -----
573 make DIRS=crypto SDIRS=sha "`grep '^CFLAG=' Makefile.ssl | \
574 sed -e 's/ -O[0-9] / -O0 /'`"
575 rm `ls crypto/*.o crypto/sha/*.o | grep -v 'sha_dgst\.o'`
579 This will only compile sha_dgst.c with -O0, the rest with the optimization
580 level chosen by the configuration process. When the above is done, do the
581 test and installation and you're set.
583 3. Reconfigure the toolkit with no-sha0 option to leave out SHA0. It
584 should not be used and is not used in SSL/TLS nor any other recognized
585 protocol in either case.
588 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail with "ar: command not found"?
590 Getting this message is quite usual on Solaris 2, because Sun has hidden
591 away 'ar' and other development commands in directories that aren't in
592 $PATH by default. One of those directories is '/usr/ccs/bin'. The
593 quickest way to fix this is to do the following (it assumes you use sh
594 or any sh-compatible shell):
596 ----- snip:start -----
597 PATH=${PATH}:/usr/ccs/bin; export PATH
600 and then redo the compilation. What you should really do is make sure
601 '/usr/ccs/bin' is permanently in your $PATH, for example through your
602 '.profile' (again, assuming you use a sh-compatible shell).
605 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Win32 with VC++?
607 Sometimes, you may get reports from VC++ command line (cl) that it
608 can't find standard include files like stdio.h and other weirdnesses.
609 One possible cause is that the environment isn't correctly set up.
610 To solve that problem for VC++ versions up to 6, one should run
611 VCVARS32.BAT which is found in the 'bin' subdirectory of the VC++
612 installation directory (somewhere under 'Program Files'). For VC++
613 version 7 (and up?), which is also called VS.NET, the file is called
614 VSVARS32.BAT instead.
615 This needs to be done prior to running NMAKE, and the changes are only
616 valid for the current DOS session.
619 * What is special about OpenSSL on Redhat?
621 Red Hat Linux (release 7.0 and later) include a preinstalled limited
622 version of OpenSSL. For patent reasons, support for IDEA, RC5 and MDC2
623 is disabled in this version. The same may apply to other Linux distributions.
624 Users may therefore wish to install more or all of the features left out.
626 To do this you MUST ensure that you do not overwrite the openssl that is in
627 /usr/bin on your Red Hat machine. Several packages depend on this file,
628 including sendmail and ssh. /usr/local/bin is a good alternative choice. The
629 libraries that come with Red Hat 7.0 onwards have different names and so are
630 not affected. (eg For Red Hat 7.2 they are /lib/libssl.so.0.9.6b and
631 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6b with symlinks /lib/libssl.so.2 and
632 /lib/libcrypto.so.2 respectively).
634 Please note that we have been advised by Red Hat attempting to recompile the
635 openssl rpm with all the cryptography enabled will not work. All other
636 packages depend on the original Red Hat supplied openssl package. It is also
637 worth noting that due to the way Red Hat supplies its packages, updates to
638 openssl on each distribution never change the package version, only the
639 build number. For example, on Red Hat 7.1, the latest openssl package has
640 version number 0.9.6 and build number 9 even though it contains all the
641 relevant updates in packages up to and including 0.9.6b.
643 A possible way around this is to persuade Red Hat to produce a non-US
644 version of Red Hat Linux.
646 FYI: Patent numbers and expiry dates of US patents:
647 MDC-2: 4,908,861 13/03/2007
648 IDEA: 5,214,703 25/05/2010
649 RC5: 5,724,428 03/03/2015
652 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on MacOS X?
654 If the failure happens when trying to build the "openssl" binary, with
655 a large number of undefined symbols, it's very probable that you have
656 OpenSSL 0.9.6b delivered with the operating system (you can find out by
657 running '/usr/bin/openssl version') and that you were trying to build
658 OpenSSL 0.9.7 or newer. The problem is that the loader ('ld') in
659 MacOS X has a misfeature that's quite difficult to go around.
660 Look in the file PROBLEMS for a more detailed explanation and for possible
664 * Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail on MacOS X?
666 If the failure happens when running 'make test' and the RC4 test fails,
667 it's very probable that you have OpenSSL 0.9.6b delivered with the
668 operating system (you can find out by running '/usr/bin/openssl version')
669 and that you were trying to build OpenSSL 0.9.6d. The problem is that
670 the loader ('ld') in MacOS X has a misfeature that's quite difficult to
671 go around and has linked the programs "openssl" and the test programs
672 with /usr/lib/libcrypto.dylib and /usr/lib/libssl.dylib instead of the
673 libraries you just built.
674 Look in the file PROBLEMS for a more detailed explanation and for possible
677 * Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in BN_sqr test [on a 64-bit platform]?
679 Failure in BN_sqr test is most likely caused by a failure to configure the
680 toolkit for current platform or lack of support for the platform in question.
681 Run './config -t' and './apps/openssl version -p'. Do these platform
682 identifiers match? If they don't, then you most likely failed to run
683 ./config and you're hereby advised to do so before filing a bug report.
684 If ./config itself fails to run, then it's most likely problem with your
685 local environment and you should turn to your system administrator (or
686 similar). If identifiers match (and/or no alternative identifier is
687 suggested by ./config script), then the platform is unsupported. There might
688 or might not be a workaround. Most notably on SPARC64 platforms with GNU
689 C compiler you should be able to produce a working build by running
690 './config -m32'. I understand that -m32 might not be what you want/need,
691 but the build should be operational. For further details turn to
692 <openssl-dev@openssl.org>.
694 * Why does OpenBSD-i386 build fail on des-586.s with "Unimplemented segment type"?
696 As of 0.9.7 assembler routines were overhauled for position independence
697 of the machine code, which is essential for shared library support. For
698 some reason OpenBSD is equipped with an out-of-date GNU assembler which
699 finds the new code offensive. To work around the problem, configure with
700 no-asm (and sacrifice a great deal of performance) or patch your assembler
701 according to <URL: http://www.openssl.org/~appro/gas-1.92.3.OpenBSD.patch>.
702 For your convenience a pre-compiled replacement binary is provided at
703 <URL: http://www.openssl.org/~appro/gas-1.92.3.static.aout.bin>.
704 Reportedly elder *BSD a.out platforms also suffer from this problem and
705 remedy should be same. Provided binary is statically linked and should be
706 working across wider range of *BSD branches, not just OpenBSD.
708 * Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in sha512t on x86 CPU?
710 If the test program in question fails withs SIGILL, Illegal Instruction
711 exception, then you more than likely to run SSE2-capable CPU, such as
712 Intel P4, under control of kernel which does not support SSE2
713 instruction extentions. See accompanying INSTALL file and
714 OPENSSL_ia32cap(3) documentation page for further information.
716 * Why does compiler fail to compile sha512.c?
718 OpenSSL SHA-512 implementation depends on compiler support for 64-bit
719 integer type. Few elder compilers [ULTRIX cc, SCO compiler to mention a
720 couple] lack support for this and therefore are incapable of compiling
721 the module in question. The recommendation is to disable SHA-512 by
722 adding no-sha512 to ./config [or ./Configure] command line. Another
723 possible alternative might be to switch to GCC.
725 * Test suite still fails, what to do?
727 Another common reason for failure to complete some particular test is
728 simply bad code generated by a buggy component in toolchain or deficiency
729 in run-time environment. There are few cases documented in PROBLEMS file,
730 consult it for possible workaround before you beat the drum. Even if you
731 don't find solution or even mention there, do reserve for possibility of
732 a compiler bug. Compiler bugs might appear in rather bizarre ways, they
733 never make sense, and tend to emerge when you least expect them. In order
734 to identify one, drop optimization level, e.g. by editing CFLAG line in
735 top-level Makefile, recompile and re-run the test.
737 * I think I've found a bug, what should I do?
739 If you are a new user then it is quite likely you haven't found a bug and
740 something is happening you aren't familiar with. Check this FAQ, the associated
741 documentation and the mailing lists for similar queries. If you are still
742 unsure whether it is a bug or not submit a query to the openssl-users mailing
746 * I'm SURE I've found a bug, how do I report it?
748 Bug reports with no security implications should be sent to the request
749 tracker. This can be done by mailing the report to <rt@openssl.org> (or its
750 alias <openssl-bugs@openssl.org>), please note that messages sent to the
751 request tracker also appear in the public openssl-dev mailing list.
753 The report should be in plain text. Any patches should be sent as
754 plain text attachments because some mailers corrupt patches sent inline.
755 If your issue affects multiple versions of OpenSSL check any patches apply
756 cleanly and, if possible include patches to each affected version.
758 The report should be given a meaningful subject line briefly summarising the
759 issue. Just "bug in OpenSSL" or "bug in OpenSSL 0.9.8n" is not very helpful.
761 By sending reports to the request tracker the bug can then be given a priority
762 and assigned to the appropriate maintainer. The history of discussions can be
763 accessed and if the issue has been addressed or a reason why not. If patches
764 are only sent to openssl-dev they can be mislaid if a team member has to
765 wade through months of old messages to review the discussion.
767 See also <URL: http://www.openssl.org/support/rt.html>
770 * I've found a security issue, how do I report it?
772 If you think your bug has security implications then please send it to
773 openssl-security@openssl.org if you don't get a prompt reply at least
774 acknowledging receipt then resend or mail it directly to one of the
775 more active team members (e.g. Steve).
777 [PROG] ========================================================================
779 * Is OpenSSL thread-safe?
781 Yes (with limitations: an SSL connection may not concurrently be used
782 by multiple threads). On Windows and many Unix systems, OpenSSL
783 automatically uses the multi-threaded versions of the standard
784 libraries. If your platform is not one of these, consult the INSTALL
787 Multi-threaded applications must provide two callback functions to
788 OpenSSL by calling CRYPTO_set_locking_callback() and
789 CRYPTO_set_id_callback(), for all versions of OpenSSL up to and
790 including 0.9.8[abc...]. As of version 1.0.0, CRYPTO_set_id_callback()
791 and associated APIs are deprecated by CRYPTO_THREADID_set_callback()
792 and friends. This is described in the threads(3) manpage.
794 * I've compiled a program under Windows and it crashes: why?
796 This is usually because you've missed the comment in INSTALL.W32.
797 Your application must link against the same version of the Win32
798 C-Runtime against which your openssl libraries were linked. The
799 default version for OpenSSL is /MD - "Multithreaded DLL".
801 If you are using Microsoft Visual C++'s IDE (Visual Studio), in
802 many cases, your new project most likely defaulted to "Debug
803 Singlethreaded" - /ML. This is NOT interchangeable with /MD and your
804 program will crash, typically on the first BIO related read or write
807 For each of the six possible link stage configurations within Win32,
808 your application must link against the same by which OpenSSL was
809 built. If you are using MS Visual C++ (Studio) this can be changed
812 1. Select Settings... from the Project Menu.
813 2. Select the C/C++ Tab.
814 3. Select "Code Generation from the "Category" drop down list box
815 4. Select the Appropriate library (see table below) from the "Use
816 run-time library" drop down list box. Perform this step for both
817 your debug and release versions of your application (look at the
818 top left of the settings panel to change between the two)
820 Single Threaded /ML - MS VC++ often defaults to
822 version of a new project.
823 Debug Single Threaded /MLd - MS VC++ often defaults to
824 this for the debug version
827 Debug Multithreaded /MTd
828 Multithreaded DLL /MD - OpenSSL defaults to this.
829 Debug Multithreaded DLL /MDd
831 Note that debug and release libraries are NOT interchangeable. If you
832 built OpenSSL with /MD your application must use /MD and cannot use /MDd.
834 As per 0.9.8 the above limitation is eliminated for .DLLs. OpenSSL
835 .DLLs compiled with some specific run-time option [we insist on the
836 default /MD] can be deployed with application compiled with different
837 option or even different compiler. But there is a catch! Instead of
838 re-compiling OpenSSL toolkit, as you would have to with prior versions,
839 you have to compile small C snippet with compiler and/or options of
840 your choice. The snippet gets installed as
841 <install-root>/include/openssl/applink.c and should be either added to
842 your application project or simply #include-d in one [and only one]
843 of your application source files. Failure to link this shim module
844 into your application manifests itself as fatal "no OPENSSL_Applink"
845 run-time error. An explicit reminder is due that in this situation
846 [mixing compiler options] it is as important to add CRYPTO_malloc_init
847 prior first call to OpenSSL.
849 * How do I read or write a DER encoded buffer using the ASN1 functions?
851 You have two options. You can either use a memory BIO in conjunction
852 with the i2d_*_bio() or d2i_*_bio() functions or you can use the
853 i2d_*(), d2i_*() functions directly. Since these are often the
854 cause of grief here are some code fragments using PKCS7 as an example:
856 unsigned char *buf, *p;
859 len = i2d_PKCS7(p7, NULL);
860 buf = OPENSSL_malloc(len); /* or Malloc, error checking omitted */
864 At this point buf contains the len bytes of the DER encoding of
867 The opposite assumes we already have len bytes in buf:
871 p7 = d2i_PKCS7(NULL, &p, len);
873 At this point p7 contains a valid PKCS7 structure or NULL if an error
874 occurred. If an error occurred ERR_print_errors(bio) should give more
877 The reason for the temporary variable 'p' is that the ASN1 functions
878 increment the passed pointer so it is ready to read or write the next
879 structure. This is often a cause of problems: without the temporary
880 variable the buffer pointer is changed to point just after the data
881 that has been read or written. This may well be uninitialized data
882 and attempts to free the buffer will have unpredictable results
883 because it no longer points to the same address.
885 Memory allocation and encoding can also be combined in a single
886 operation by the ASN1 routines:
888 unsigned char *buf = NULL; /* mandatory */
890 len = i2d_PKCS7(p7, &buf);
893 /* Do some things with 'buf' */
894 /* Finished with buf: free it */
897 In this special case the "buf" parameter is *not* incremented, it points
898 to the start of the encoding.
901 * OpenSSL uses DER but I need BER format: does OpenSSL support BER?
903 The short answer is yes, because DER is a special case of BER and OpenSSL
904 ASN1 decoders can process BER.
906 The longer answer is that ASN1 structures can be encoded in a number of
907 different ways. One set of ways is the Basic Encoding Rules (BER) with various
908 permissible encodings. A restriction of BER is the Distinguished Encoding
909 Rules (DER): these uniquely specify how a given structure is encoded.
911 Therefore, because DER is a special case of BER, DER is an acceptable encoding
915 * I've tried using <M_some_evil_pkcs12_macro> and I get errors why?
917 This usually happens when you try compiling something using the PKCS#12
918 macros with a C++ compiler. There is hardly ever any need to use the
919 PKCS#12 macros in a program, it is much easier to parse and create
920 PKCS#12 files using the PKCS12_parse() and PKCS12_create() functions
921 documented in doc/openssl.txt and with examples in demos/pkcs12. The
922 'pkcs12' application has to use the macros because it prints out
923 debugging information.
926 * I've called <some function> and it fails, why?
928 Before submitting a report or asking in one of the mailing lists, you
929 should try to determine the cause. In particular, you should call
930 ERR_print_errors() or ERR_print_errors_fp() after the failed call
931 and see if the message helps. Note that the problem may occur earlier
932 than you think -- you should check for errors after every call where
933 it is possible, otherwise the actual problem may be hidden because
934 some OpenSSL functions clear the error state.
937 * I just get a load of numbers for the error output, what do they mean?
939 The actual format is described in the ERR_print_errors() manual page.
940 You should call the function ERR_load_crypto_strings() before hand and
941 the message will be output in text form. If you can't do this (for example
942 it is a pre-compiled binary) you can use the errstr utility on the error
943 code itself (the hex digits after the second colon).
946 * Why do I get errors about unknown algorithms?
948 The cause is forgetting to load OpenSSL's table of algorithms with
949 OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms(). See the manual page for more information. This
950 can cause several problems such as being unable to read in an encrypted
951 PEM file, unable to decrypt a PKCS#12 file or signature failure when
952 verifying certificates.
954 * Why can't the OpenSSH configure script detect OpenSSL?
956 Several reasons for problems with the automatic detection exist.
957 OpenSSH requires at least version 0.9.5a of the OpenSSL libraries.
958 Sometimes the distribution has installed an older version in the system
959 locations that is detected instead of a new one installed. The OpenSSL
960 library might have been compiled for another CPU or another mode (32/64 bits).
961 Permissions might be wrong.
963 The general answer is to check the config.log file generated when running
964 the OpenSSH configure script. It should contain the detailed information
965 on why the OpenSSL library was not detected or considered incompatible.
968 * Can I use OpenSSL's SSL library with non-blocking I/O?
970 Yes; make sure to read the SSL_get_error(3) manual page!
972 A pitfall to avoid: Don't assume that SSL_read() will just read from
973 the underlying transport or that SSL_write() will just write to it --
974 it is also possible that SSL_write() cannot do any useful work until
975 there is data to read, or that SSL_read() cannot do anything until it
976 is possible to send data. One reason for this is that the peer may
977 request a new TLS/SSL handshake at any time during the protocol,
978 requiring a bi-directional message exchange; both SSL_read() and
979 SSL_write() will try to continue any pending handshake.
982 * Why doesn't my server application receive a client certificate?
984 Due to the TLS protocol definition, a client will only send a certificate,
985 if explicitly asked by the server. Use the SSL_VERIFY_PEER flag of the
986 SSL_CTX_set_verify() function to enable the use of client certificates.
989 * Why does compilation fail due to an undefined symbol NID_uniqueIdentifier?
991 For OpenSSL 0.9.7 the OID table was extended and corrected. In earlier
992 versions, uniqueIdentifier was incorrectly used for X.509 certificates.
993 The correct name according to RFC2256 (LDAP) is x500UniqueIdentifier.
994 Change your code to use the new name when compiling against OpenSSL 0.9.7.
997 * I think I've detected a memory leak, is this a bug?
999 In most cases the cause of an apparent memory leak is an OpenSSL internal table
1000 that is allocated when an application starts up. Since such tables do not grow
1001 in size over time they are harmless.
1003 These internal tables can be freed up when an application closes using various
1004 functions. Currently these include following:
1006 Thread-local cleanup functions:
1010 Application-global cleanup functions that are aware of usage (and therefore
1013 ENGINE_cleanup() and CONF_modules_unload()
1015 "Brutal" (thread-unsafe) Application-global cleanup functions:
1017 ERR_free_strings(), EVP_cleanup() and CRYPTO_cleanup_all_ex_data().
1020 * Why does Valgrind complain about the use of uninitialized data?
1022 When OpenSSL's PRNG routines are called to generate random numbers the supplied
1023 buffer contents are mixed into the entropy pool: so it technically does not
1024 matter whether the buffer is initialized at this point or not. Valgrind (and
1025 other test tools) will complain about this. When using Valgrind, make sure the
1026 OpenSSL library has been compiled with the PURIFY macro defined (-DPURIFY)
1027 to get rid of these warnings.
1030 * Why doesn't a memory BIO work when a file does?
1032 This can occur in several cases for example reading an S/MIME email message.
1033 The reason is that a memory BIO can do one of two things when all the data
1034 has been read from it.
1036 The default behaviour is to indicate that no more data is available and that
1037 the call should be retried, this is to allow the application to fill up the BIO
1040 Alternatively it can indicate that no more data is available and that EOF has
1043 If a memory BIO is to behave in the same way as a file this second behaviour
1044 is needed. This must be done by calling:
1046 BIO_set_mem_eof_return(bio, 0);
1048 See the manual pages for more details.
1051 * Where are the declarations and implementations of d2i_X509() etc?
1053 These are defined and implemented by macros of the form:
1056 DECLARE_ASN1_FUNCTIONS(X509) and IMPLEMENT_ASN1_FUNCTIONS(X509)
1058 The implementation passes an ASN1 "template" defining the structure into an
1059 ASN1 interpreter using generalised functions such as ASN1_item_d2i().
1062 ===============================================================================